Thanks for your feedback... Good stuff.
-Original Message-
From: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cliff Wells
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:55 PM
To: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pylon with Apache
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01
There is also another way of integrating with apache:
http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/mod_wsgi/
Wichert.
Previously Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
What are the
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 11:21 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is also another way of integrating with apache:
http://www.rkblog.rk.edu.pl/w/p/mod_wsgi/
When I saw this module, I thought oh, cool and actually (briefly)
considered trying to port it to Nginx, but came back to the arguments I
On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead of
just usingmod_python?
Typically, proxying is:
1. easier to setup thanmod_python
2. easier to
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:42 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On Apr 28, 6:40 am, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead
of just usingmod_python?
Typically,
of just using mod_python?
AtDhVaAnNkCsE !!
-Original Message-
From: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shannon -jj Behrens
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:58 PM
To: pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pylon with Apache
On 4/17/07, durumdara
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 07:36 -0600, Orr, Steve wrote:
What are the advantages/disadvantages pros/cons to doing a proxy instead of
just using mod_python?
Typically, proxying is:
1. easier to setup than mod_python
2. easier to upgrade Python (no mod_python/python version issues)
3. doesn't
On 4/20/07, Erik Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it's the word database that's that's throwing me, admin is
totally cool :) Unless I'm missing the whole point, and I doubt that I am,
you guys are writing code to generate scaffold views and controllers for
projects' declared models
On 4/20/07, Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/20/07, Erik Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it's the word database that's that's throwing me, admin is
totally cool :) Unless I'm missing the whole point, and I doubt that I am,
you guys are writing code to generate
ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel ideas
in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are two.
There are not predefined views
based on these in Pylons. You can certainly
write an application that uses an ORM for database
On 4/19/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
ideas
in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
two.
There are not predefined views
based on these in Pylons. You can certainly
On 4/19/07, Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
ideas
in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
two.
There are not predefined
On 4/19/07, Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ActiveRecord is a Ruby-on-Rails concept, although there are parallel
ideas
in any Object-Relational-Mapper, of which SQLObject and SQLAlchemy are
two.
There are not predefined
In TurboGears, they have CatWalk, but it's for SQLObject. Django has
this feature as well. Pylons doesn't. When I chose Pylons, I felt
that it had benefits that were more important than this one feature.
But, your mileage may vary. If this is a feature that you absolutely
must have, I
On 4/19/07, Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Erik Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a discussion on this list called automatic database
administration tool that you might want to read. Pylons does not
Shannon -jj Behrens írta:
1. You can use any DBAPI adaptor with Pylons in order to talk to a
database without using an ORM. I've used one before on Linux to talk
to SQLServer.
2. Some ORMs may not support ODBC. I do know that SQLAlchemy works
with both SQLServer and Oracle, though.
That
On 4/18/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shannon -jj Behrens írta:
4. To deal with the reload problem, *in development* I like to set
Apache's MaxRequestsPerChild to 1.
Yes, this is the only way to get out from Module Reloading hell.
But I don't know that this MaxRequestsPerChild
Hi!
Jose Galvez írta:
as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
there is also the mxODBC package. On linux I'm not
On 4/17/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Jose Galvez írta:
as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
On 4/17/07, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Jose Galvez írta:
as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
as fare as odbc is concerned, pylons or any other web framework really
has nothing to do with it, thats up to python and DB2 support. If your
on the windows platform ODBC can be done with the win32all package and
there is also the mxODBC package. On linux I'm not sure. As for
Apache, I use
Hi!
An user helped me with this:
You could consider modwsgi:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/
And next I found this info:
http://pylonshq.com/project/pylonshq/wiki/ModPython
But I need to get answer to these questions too:
1.)
The development under modpy sometimes became very hard,
Hi,
On Apr 12, 5:55 pm, durumdara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I want to ask about Pylons:
Can I use Pylons under Apache?
Sure you can. Check out
http://docs.pythonweb.org/display/pylonscookbook/Deployment,
there are plenty of options.
We have PHP, Python sites (8-10 virtual hosts) and we
Hi!
We have used Apache with modpython3.
We have used our owned python code as framework, and we used DBISAM
databases with ODBC connections.
Now I read about Pylons and Django. As I see the DJANGO not supports
the ODBC connection.
So I want to ask about Pylons:
Can I use Pylons under Apache?
24 matches
Mail list logo
