On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
Python is so messed up, the only explanation is that the people making
it up are blindly following misguided principles.
Since it's so easy to make a web framework in Python, why don't you
make your own and then you won't have to
I was just responding to other people's posts, and I'm not the only
person to ever criticize python (while still acknoledging its
strengths).
On Jan 23, 1:45 am, Alberto Valverde albe...@toscat.net wrote:
Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Vanasco jonat...@findmeon.com wrote:
i store a lot of stuff in config, much of which is 'framework' related
across modules.
the current way i deal with bools is this ( by storing things in
app_globals during init )
g.enable_feature_x= False
This is another example of the flawed, broken code known as Paste.
Pylons should decouple itself from Paste
On Jan 22, 12:11 pm, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Vanasco jonat...@findmeon.com
wrote:
i store a lot of stuff in config, much of
On Jan 22, 1:14 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
This is another example of the flawed, broken code known as Paste.
Pylons should decouple itself from Paste
But Pylons, as you've pointed out, is flawed in numerous ways as well.
Let's throw it *all* away!
I would gladly throw python away if only ruby matched its performance.
On Jan 22, 3:48 pm, Wyatt Baldwin wyatt.lee.bald...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:14 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
This is another example of the flawed, broken code known as Paste.
Pylons should decouple itself
On Jan 22, 8:21 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
I would gladly throw python away if only ruby matched its performance.
There's another option you may be interested, in case you haven't
heard of it: C. It's *very* fast.
On Jan 22, 3:48 pm, Wyatt Baldwin wyatt.lee.bald...@gmail.com wrote:
C is my expertise, but it can't match the productivity of python or
Ruby
Fortnately for C, it will always retain the performance crownm so it
will always have its uses
The same thing cannot be said for python. Once its performance is once
its performance is matched by a
better language such as
On Jan 22, 9:43 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
C is my expertise, but it can't match the productivity of python or
Ruby
Fortnately for C, it will always retain the performance crownm so it
will always have its uses
The same thing cannot be said for python. Once its performance is once
i store a lot of stuff in config, much of which is 'framework' related
across modules.
the current way i deal with bools is this ( by storing things in
app_globals during init )
g.enable_feature_x= False
if 'org.opensn.pylons.enable_feature_x' in config:
If you mean what is the best practise to convert bools, PasteDeploy
provide a few helpers:
from paste.deploy.converters import asbool
I also have this in helpers.py (don't know why I can't find something
similar in the paste namespace):
class Params(dict):
def __getattr__(self, attr):
11 matches
Mail list logo
