(Resending, since Google Groups is in a snit and didn't want to accept
my primary email address, insisting I use the @gmail.com one.)
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:25:49AM -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I've found unit-testing to be not worth it -- it always passes, but I
find tons of errors on
Previously Marius Gedminas wrote:
Testing JavaScript is a bit harder. I've seen how people integrate
JavaScript *unit* tests into their py.test test suite, and I've used those
ideas to define a unittest.TestCase subclass that spawns a browser
window and drives it to run JsUnit-compatible
this is pretty neat - i didn't know you could drive selenium through
python/unittest. that would do exactly what i need!
and yes, a balance of unit tests and integrated/functional is the best
mix.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
selenium?
for integration you could try using the python client driver
http://seleniumhq.org/projects/remote-control/languages/python.html
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Vanasco jonat...@findmeon.comwrote:
I've found unit-testing to be not worth it -- it always passes, but I
find
I've found unit-testing to be not worth it -- it always passes, but I
find tons of errors on the integration w/sessions and html side.
does anyone have good pointers for automating that sort of testing ,
and integrating it into the pylons suite?
