Hi,
I have noticed an 'odd' behavior when calculating electrostatic surface
potential representations between the APBS Tools (v1.2r3) and APBS Tools2
(v1.3) where the results are significantly different depending on which version
of Pymol I use (recently upgraded to 1.3 and noticed this when re-making a
figure that was originally made using 1.2r3)!
I am just wondering, has anyone else observed similar behavior? The results
from v1.3 look more accurate, which worries me somewhat about the figures I
have previously made using the v1.2r3 APBS plugin! While i am happy using v1.3
(which agrees reasonably well with other programs), people currently using
v1.2r3 or the like might want to investigate further by comparing their results
to v1.3.
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Cheers,
Nick
--------------------------------
[ Nicholas Noinaj ]
the Buchanan Lab
Laboratory of Molecular Biology
LMB-NIDDK, NIH
50 South Drive, Room 4505
Bethesda, MD 20892-8030
1-301-594-9230 (lab)
1-859-893-4789 (cell)
noin...@niddk.nih.gov<mailto:noin...@niddk.nih.gov>
[ the Buchanan Lab ]
http://www-mslmb.niddk.nih.gov/buchanan/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
