[PyQt] PyQt4 X64?

2011-04-13 Thread zhao_yunsong
is there 64bit PyQt4? 2011-04-13 zhao_yunsong ___ PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt

Re: [PyQt] PyQt4 X64?

2011-04-13 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 13/04/2011 08:19, zhao_yunsong a écrit : is there 64bit PyQt4? Have you looked at the PyQt4 download page ? ___ PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt

[PyQt] Can't call QTest::touchEvent(widget)

2011-04-13 Thread Anton Chikin
Hello All, I'm using PyQt version 4.8.3-2, shipped with Ubuntu 11.04 beta. While I was trying to use new multitouch testing function QTest::touchEvent() http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/qtest.html#touchEvent I've come across the issue. This piece of code from PyQt4 import QtTest def testMT(self):

Re: [PyQt] Can't call QTest::touchEvent(widget)

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Thompson
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:31:05 +0400, Anton Chikin kverlin.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I'm using PyQt version 4.8.3-2, shipped with Ubuntu 11.04 beta. While I was trying to use new multitouch testing function QTest::touchEvent() http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/qtest.html#touchEvent I've

[PyQt] How to disconnect all connected signals of an object

2011-04-13 Thread Detlev Offenbach
Hello, what is the correct way to disconnect all signal connected to an object? I tried it with code like browser.disconnect() but that raises an exception TypeError arguments did not match any overloaded call: QObject.disconnect(QObject, SIGNAL(), QObject, SLOT()): not enough arguments

Re: [PyQt] How to disconnect all connected signals of an object

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Thompson
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:20:22 +0200, Detlev Offenbach det...@die-offenbachs.de wrote: Hello, what is the correct way to disconnect all signal connected to an object? I tried it with code like browser.disconnect() but that raises an exception TypeError arguments did not match any

[PyQt] SIP: Suggestions for a new major version

2011-04-13 Thread Jens Thoms Toerring
Hi, there are what I feel are a few rough edges to SIP were I'd be very happy if a new major version would improve on it. One of these points is that SIP does balk at some legal C++ syntax. E.g. it doesn't want to understand types like 'long int', it only accepts 'long' (same for 'short