Re: [Pytables-users] ANN: PyTables 3.0 final

Thank you from a happy user :))) On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Antonio Valentino antonio.valent...@tiscali.it wrote: === Announcing PyTables 3.0.0 === We are happy to announce PyTables 3.0.0. PyTables 3.0.0 comes after about 5 years

Re: [Pytables-users] Some method like a table.readWhereSorted

/PyTables/issues/225 Be Well Anthony On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Dr. Louis Wicker louis.wic...@noaa.govwrote: I am also interested in the this capability, if it exists in some way... Lou On Apr 10, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Julio Trevisan juliotrevi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

[Pytables-users] ReadWhere() with a Time64Col in the condition

Hi, I am using a Time64Col called timestamp in a condition, and I noticed that the condition does not work (i.e., no rows are selected) if I write something as: for row in node.where(timestamp == %f % t): ... However, I had this idea of dividing the values by, say 1000, and it does work:

[Pytables-users] Some method like a table.readWhereSorted

Hi, Is there a way that I could have the ability of readWhere (i.e., specify condition, and fast result) but also using a CSIndex so that the rows come sorted in a particular order? I checked readSorted() but it is iterative and does not allow to specify a condition. Julio

[Pytables-users] Reading single column from table

Hi, I just joined this list, I am using PyTables for my project and it works great and fast. I am just trying to optimize some parts of the program and I noticed that zipping the tuples to get one tuple per column takes much longer than reading the data itself. The thing is that readWhere()