[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Change by Eryk Sun : -- type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Change by Eryk Sun : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg221020 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Chris can you prepare a patch for this? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16272

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

eryksun added the comment: It could also mention the generic getter and setter functions for the PyGetSetDef that were added in 3.3: PyType_GenericGetDict and PyType_GenericSetDict. https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/object.html#c.PyType_GenericGetDict -- nosy: +eryksun

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Changes by Martin Kysel mar...@martinkysel.com: -- nosy: +mkysel ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16272 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16272 ___ ___

[issue16272] C-API documentation clarification for tp_dictoffset

New submission from Chris Colbert: The documentation of the tp_dictoffset is a bit unclear when describing the responsibilities of a base type with a nonzero tp_dictoffset. http://docs.python.org/c-api/typeobj.html I feel there should some statement to the effect of: If a type defines a