Re: Vote on whether to integrate server side include (SSI) support.

2006-03-14 Thread André Malo
* Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have examples of SSI tag handlers that you might implement this way if such a feature were available? I ask as it all good to speculate on such a feature, but like this generic #python tag, would it in itself be used either? Actually,

Cross-platform query: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in python and httpd

2006-03-14 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
Could folks with access to different OS's try the following: Compare output of apxs -q CPPFLAGS with the value of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in pyconfig.h. For example, on my Fedora Core 4 i386 system (stock httpd and python): $ /usr/sbin/apxs -q CPPFLAGS -DSSL_EXPERIMENTAL_ENGINE [note - no

Re: Cross-platform query: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in python and httpd

2006-03-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Debian Sid (httpd and python2.3 are stock debian): $ /usr/bin/apxs2 -q CPPFLAGS $ grep _FILE_OFFSET_BITS /usr/include/python2.3/pyconfig.h #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 Jim Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: Could folks with access to different OS's try the following: Compare output of apxs

Re: Cross-platform query: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in python and httpd

2006-03-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 15/03/2006, at 8:45 AM, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: Could folks with access to different OS's try the following: Compare output of apxs -q CPPFLAGS with the value of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in pyconfig.h. For example, on my Fedora Core 4 i386 system (stock httpd and python): $

Re: Cross-platform query: _FILE_OFFSET_BITS in python and httpd

2006-03-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 3/14/06, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What the output on Fedora Core 4 means is that essentially Python and APR/httpd are compiled in an incomatible way - in APR the size of an inode (ino_t) is 32 bits and in Python it is 64 bits (this is what _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64

Bug in Apache ap_internal_fast_redirect() function????

2006-03-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
I know this is the wrong list to be asking this, but thought I would ask before I go and get my self subscribed to some Apache server list just to ask the question as I know some more involved in Apache core lurk here. :-) I have been looking at a way of solving:

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-104) Allow Python code callouts with mod_include (SSI).

2006-03-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-104?page=comments#action_12370468 ] Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-104: Patches for SSI support will not work with Apache 2.2. Names of macros have changed which mean it will not

Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-14 Thread Mike Looijmans
... Any other issues for a 3.2.9 release? (This is where Mike L. should advocate for MODPYTHON-93 - Improved FieldStorage. ;) ) Eh, yeah, I have a suggestion: MODPYTHON-93 - Improved FieldStorage - Stop putting simple key/value pairs into StringIO objects, put them simple str objects - Use