Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-17 Thread Ron Reisor
+1 MacOS-10.4.4 Apache-2.0.55 mpm-prefork Python-2.4.2 cheers, Ron Ron Reisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RWR3) University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716 pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E FF

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-17 Thread Michel Jouvin
0 : HP Tru64, mpm-worker In fact 3.2.6b runs as 3.2.5b. Basically in real context it works except the fact that after a segfault in the Apache child or a signal received other than TERM or USR1, it doesn't reinitialize properly and forbid proper reinitialization of the new Apache child (I

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-17 Thread Jim Gallacher
Michel Jouvin wrote: 0 : HP Tru64, mpm-worker In fact 3.2.6b runs as 3.2.5b. Basically in real context it works except the fact that after a segfault in the Apache child or a signal received other than TERM or USR1, it doesn't reinitialize properly and forbid proper reinitialization

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-16 Thread Nick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Linux (amd64) Ubuntu Breezy (5.10), apache 2.0.54 (mpm-worker), python 2.4 Jim Gallacher wrote: | A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing. | Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which | should

mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-15 Thread Jim Gallacher
A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing. Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which should also be available at www.modpython.org/dist shortly. This release is similar to 3.2.5b but fixes a couple of issues - MODPYTHON-95, 96, 97, 98, 99,

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-15 Thread Jorey Bump
+1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4 Jim Gallacher wrote: $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is $ make $ (su) # make install Then (as non-root user!) $ cd test $ python test.py What are the chances of enhancing the procedure as follows: $ ./configure

Re: mod_python 3.2.6b available for testing

2006-01-15 Thread John McFarlane
+1 Gentoo [current], Apache-2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python-2.4, gcc-3.4.4 Jim Gallacher wrote: A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing. Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which should also be available at www.modpython.org/dist shortly.

Re: 3.2.6b

2006-01-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
outstanding issue that should be included in 3.2 is http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-106. If this is correct I'll commit Graham's patch tonight and roll the 3.2.6b tarball. Let's try and get 3.2 final out asap. The only other candidates that one might seriously consider

Re: 3.2.6b

2006-01-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Graham Dumpleton wrote .. The only other candidates that one might seriously consider are: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-105 Simple change and Grisha agreed that should truncate output for HEAD. That should have said should NOT truncate. Graham

3.2.6b

2005-12-28 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
I hope everyone's having a merry Christmas or whatever other holidays you're celebrating :-) I haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks like last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs came out of the woodwork. Does it look like we're near being ready to roll

Re: 3.2.6b

2005-12-28 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks like last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs came out of the woodwork. Does it look like we're near being ready to roll 3.2.6b now? Grisha

Re: 3.2.6b

2005-12-28 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
2005/12/28, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Grisha, I have though asked for a small change to be made which will allow me to make available a proposed new module importer when its done and for people be able to trial it without having to patch their source code. See:

3.2.6b?

2005-12-17 Thread Jim Gallacher
We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon. A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we should do another beta followed very quickly by a final release. Any new bugs that

Re: 3.2.6b?

2005-12-17 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 18/12/2005, at 3:09 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon. A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we should do another beta followed