On 4/22/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately it tends to be just you and I tossing ideas back and forth
and when you have a two person democracy at work, hard to get some
consensus of what is the best direction to go. :-(
I think the namespace direction you're taking is
We are slowly acquiring a number of reserved PythonOption keywords
which should likely be collected in one place so we don't end up with
any name collisions. Does the PythonOption page in section 5.4.10 seem
most appropriate? eg.
On 23/04/2006, at 6:29 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
We are slowly acquiring a number of reserved PythonOption
keywords which should likely be collected in one place so we don't
end up with any name collisions. Does the PythonOption page in
section 5.4.10 seem most appropriate? eg.
