Re: Does 3.2 still support python 2.2?

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Gallacher
I figured we had moved on to 2.3, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something before I changed the docs. I'm not sure if there was a formal decision on this or everyone just assumed it was true. Perhaps a pronoucement from Grisha to make it offical? If python 2.2 support has been

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=all ] Jim Gallacher updated MODPYTHON-99: --- Attachment: md-20051209.diff Martin's patch (md-20051209.diff) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
: Jim Gallacher Priority: Critical Attachments: md-20051209.diff Martin Devara discovered a segfault when accessing some request object members. For example: def handler(req): req.content_type = text/plain req.write(EE\n) a = getattr(req,allowed_methods

Re: Does 3.2 still support python 2.2?

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Gallacher
OK then, good enough. Next question. Should we bump the Apache version requirement as well. Currently the docs state that Apache 2.0.40 or later is required. I don't recall seeing anyone testing mod_python 3.2 on anything less than apache 2.0.53. I don't know if there are any changes between

Re: Does 3.2 still support python 2.2?

2005-12-09 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: Next question. Should we bump the Apache version requirement as well. Currently the docs state that Apache 2.0.40 or later is required. I don't recall seeing anyone testing mod_python 3.2 on anything less than apache 2.0.53. I don't know if there are