Re: [jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

I declare the voting over and empty tuple wins in a landslide. :) I'll commit the changes shortly. Jim Nicolas Lehuen wrote: +1 for the empty tuple too. Regards, Nicolas 2005/12/17, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA) wrote: [

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=comments#action_12360041 ] Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-99: - Modifying util.c so that tuple_from_array_header and tuple_from_method_list return an empty tuple instead of None fixes

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=comments#action_12360042 ] Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-99: - OK, if we modify tuple_from_array_header and tuple_from_method_list, here are the members that would be defined as an

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=comments#action_12360048 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-99: The req.allowed_xmethods, req.allowed_methods documentation states that these are a tuples. It seems

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-99) accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=comments#action_12359969 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-99: Should we be unit testing the getters and setters for all request and server object members? accessing some request or