If we don't get an resolution on this Gentoo issue - should we just go
ahead and release the file anyway? Hopefully then someone will fix it
before the final release?
Grisha
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Hmmm... Looking at /usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py,
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
If we don't get an resolution on this Gentoo issue - should we just go
ahead and release the file anyway? Hopefully then someone will fix it
before the final release?
Since we have not received any additional information on this I think we
should proceed.
I think the proper thing to do (i forgot about the cookie and x86-64
issues) is to consider 3.2.3b as shut down by pre-release testing, so it's
just going to be a version that will never be publicly released.
The next step is to apply the fixes you mentioned below and roll a 3.2.4b,
then
Nick wrote:
More info:
python 2.4.2 on Linux:
import tempfile
t = tempfile.TemporaryFile()
t
open file 'fdopen', mode 'w+b' at 0xb7df07b8
type(t)
type 'file'
dir(t)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__getattribute__', '__hash__',
'__init__', '__iter__', '__new__',
Jim Gallacher wrote:
So this is an inconsistency within Python. Should mod_python attempt
to correct it, or just claim a Python bug?
I think we should correct it. I'm sure users don't care that we
implement this with TemporaryFile. That being said, I wonder how many
applications on Windows
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Nick wrote:
More info:
python 2.4.2 on Linux:
import tempfile
t = tempfile.TemporaryFile()
t
open file 'fdopen', mode 'w+b' at 0xb7df07b8
type(t)
type 'file'
dir(t)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__getattribute__',
'__hash__', '__init__', '__iter__',
Nick wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
So this is an inconsistency within Python. Should mod_python attempt
to correct it, or just claim a Python bug?
I think we should correct it. I'm sure users don't care that we
implement this with TemporaryFile. That being said, I wonder how many
Jim Gallacher wrote:
You may have misunderstood. I was not suggesting that
tempfile.TemporaryFile was introduced in 3.1.4, only that it existed
there. Looking at the svn repository I see it's used in 3.0.0-beta and
2.7.9, so this bug has been lurking for a while. ;)
Yes, although the fact
Indrek Järve wrote:
This behaviour has been with Python for quite a while, so claiming it's
simply a Python bug will be the same as declaring we don't support Windows.
Our company's software that runs on Windows and uses mod_python simply
patches util.py with the following change:
227c227
Jorey Bump wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Nick wrote:
More info:
python 2.4.2 on Linux:
import tempfile
t = tempfile.TemporaryFile()
t
open file 'fdopen', mode 'w+b' at 0xb7df07b8
type(t)
type 'file'
dir(t)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '__doc__', '__getattribute__',
'__hash__',
-1 for Gentoo Linux 2.6.13-gentoo-r3
Apache 2.0.54
Python 2.4.1
Haven't really got time to see what it is that's causing it right now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/src/mod_python-3.2.3b/test $ python test.py
* Testing LoadModule
Creating config
listen port: 32771
Starting Apache
Indrek Järve wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
Indrek Järve wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if
they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the
test
output, and
+1
MacOSX 10.4.2
gcc 4.0.0 (apple)
Python-2.4.2
Apache-2.0.55
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5
Dominic Wong wrote:
-1 for Gentoo Linux 2.6.13-gentoo-r3
Apache 2.0.54
Python 2.4.1
Hi Dominic,
When you have a chance could you apply the following patch and re-run
the tests?
Thanks,
Jim
Index: test/test.py
===
---
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Dominic Wong wrote:
-1 for Gentoo Linux 2.6.13-gentoo-r3
Apache 2.0.54
Python 2.4.1
Hi Dominic,
When you have a chance could you apply the following patch and re-run
the tests?
Thanks,
Jim
Hi Jim,
I pretty much get the same output:
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A new mod_python 3.2.3 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
Windows binary is also available.
This release is similar to 3.2.2b but fixes a couple a small issues
where a non-threaded python is used.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be
Jim Gallacher wrote:
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test
output, and suggestions, if any).
Thank you,
Jim Gallacher
+1 on SuSE Linux 9.2 (i586)
+1 on SuSE Linux 9.2 (x86-64) once I
Indrek Järve wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test
output, and suggestions, if any).
Thank you,
Jim Gallacher
+1 on SuSE Linux 9.2 (i586)
+1 on SuSE Linux
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
Indrek Järve wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test
output, and suggestions, if any).
Thank you,
Jim Gallacher
+1 on
19 matches
Mail list logo
