On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:13:41 -0700, Stewart Midwinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A number of people commented on the article in GCN, at
http://gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/28026-1.html, and wondered if
more could not be done to address the perception of speed. The point
is made that although
The Dec 12th check-ins break tests on WinME:
test_glob.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test_glob.py, line 78, in test_glob_one_directory
eq(self.glob('a*'), map(self.norm, ['a', 'aab', 'aaa']))
File test_glob.py, line 67, in assertSequencesEqual_noorder
So how about a slogan like Code it Fast, with Python, or Python:
Code
Fast -- one which emphasizes the (easily defended) claim that
development
time is shorter with Python, but which at the same time manages to
associate the word fast with Python.
I always liked: Python, the language that
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 09:20 -0200, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
BTW, I would move away from the fast enough when talking about
performance. It's difficult to qualify what is enough in marketing
terms; also, a selling/winning message can't be seen as taking excuses
for any reason. On the other hand,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
So how about a slogan like Code it Fast, with Python, or Python:
Code
Fast -- one which emphasizes the (easily defended) claim that
development
time is shorter with Python, but which at the same time manages to
associate the word fast with
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 259 open ( +0) / 2707 closed ( +2) / 2966 total ( +2)
Bugs: 822 open (+22) / 4685 closed (+23) / 5507 total (+45)
RFE : 160 open ( +0) / 139 closed ( +2) / 299 total ( +2)
New / Reopened Patches
__
repair
