[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Python
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25872
Modified Files:
Tag: release24-maint
thread_pthread.h
Log Message:
Patch #1163249 - Correctly handle _POSIX_SEMAPHORES == -1 to mean no
support for posix
Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
This change has broken the build on FreeBSD 4.x for me:
gcc -pthread -c -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -
I. -I./Include -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Python/thread.o Python/thread.c
In file included from Python/thread.c:101:
[Tim]
For contrast, here's one that doesn't use frexp(), and is probably
faster because of that; internally, len(sums) probably won't exceed 5
in real life (but could get as large as 2K for pathological inputs,
spanning fp's full dynamic range):
def summer4(iterable):
sums = [0.0]
Michael Chermside [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josiah Carlson writes:
[... stuff about reST and TeX ...]
While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
as decorating functions,
Michael Chermside wrote:
Josiah Carlson writes:
...While I have not used it often, I have done the equivalent of decorating
classes; it is as natural (though perhaps not quite as useful initially)
as decorating functions,
But a few *good* use cases would change my mind.
Until this weekend, I
| On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:36:41AM -0300, Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
| Edit libwebbrowser.tex as you see fit, then send it to me
| and I'll TeXify it back to you. wink
|
| Uploaded to http://python.org/sf/754022 . I am not a native English
| speaker, and this is the first
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:36:08PM -0800, Josiah Carlson wrote:
Eric Nieuwland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the ideas so far, would it possible to:
def meta(cls):
...
@meta
class X(...):
...
It is not implemented in Python 2.4. From what I understand, making
Jim Jewett wrote:
Gareth McCaughan wrote:
Some bit of my brain is convinced that [x in stuff if condition]
is the Right Syntax and keeps making me type it even though
I know it doesn't work.
(and I agree with Gareth)
On Monday 2005-03-14 12:42, Eric Nieuwland wrote:
The full syntax is:
[ f(x) for
