Brett C. wrote:
Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to
see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
Nick? =)
Something like that. . . still, I
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Brett C. wrote:
I noticed Nick's PEP is still not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
Nick? =)
Something like that. . . still, I finally got around to fixing the formatting
in
the text file and sending it back to David :)
Add to
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Brett C. wrote:
I noticed Nick's PEP is still not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
Nick? =)
Something like that. . . still, I finally got around to fixing the formatting
in
the text file and sending it back
mwh Fix test_site to not call open('...', 'wU'), as that now raises an
mwh error.
mwh Is anyone running the test suite regularly at the moment?
Whoops. I obviously failed to run it after applying that change. My
apologies.
Skip
___
[Reinhold Birkenfeld]
would anybody mind if I was given permissions on the tracker and CVS,
for
fixing small
things like bug #1202475. I feel that I can help you others out a bit
with
this and
I promise I won't change the interpreter to accept braces...
Let's start out with CVS tracker
Let's start out with CVS tracker permissions.
When you have a patch that is really to apply,
upload it to the tracker and assign to me.
really -- ready
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
My erstwhile PEP now has a real number (PEP 346), and a home on
python.org [1].
At my request, it was withdrawn immediately after submission - the
parts I think are important, Guido is taking on board for PEP 343 [2].
Cheers,
Nick.
[1] http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0346.html
[2]
