Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:55, Greg Ewing wrote:
import db where db.stdlib == True and db.language == SQL \
and db.interface == DBAPI2.0
While we're at it, we could spell import select. :-)
Getting off on a tangent here, but I would actually
like
On Mar 27, 2006, at 7:20 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Why don't we expose _PySet_Next() for Barry and leave it out of the
public API
for everyone else.
There are precedents for adding some functionality to the C API but
not documenting it to ensure non advanced users don't get hurt --
Hello,
I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in
the standard library.
+1 on db.sqlite from me.
same for me +1 on db.sqlite
db.sql.sqlite is another possibility, if adding something like Durus or
ZODB in the same top-level namespace could be considered for
[promted by Phillip Eby's post, but not in response so content snipped]
I think we both want class decorators as a more fine grained substitute
for __metaclass__ (fine grained as in declared per-class-instance instead
of this-class-and-all-its-children). I can think of three ways class
[Raymond Hettinger]
Barry, go ahead with PySet_Clear().
[Barry]
Cool thanks. I think we've also compromised on _PySet_Next(), correct?
Yes, _PySet_Next() is a good compromise for you and me -- it saves you from
writing a hack and saves my API from including a bug factory. The only issue
is
On 3/29/06, Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Hochberg wrote:
Still, perhaps for Py3K it's worth considering
if PyNumber_InplaceAdd should only call __iadd__ and __add__, not
__radd__. Thus giving the target object complete control during inplace
adds.
That's probably reasonable,
These issues are on HEAD. There might be some others I missed.
With cc there are at least 2 issues:
* test_file causes interpreter exit due to sys.stdin.seek(-1)
* test_pty fails apparently due to whitespace differences
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:03:48AM +0100, Thomas Wouters wrote:
On 3/7/06, Martin v. L??wis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Wouters wrote:
Who 'owns' Modules/_bsddb.c, if anyone?
It's a fork of pybsddb, originally contributed by Gregory Smith (*).
For all practical purposes, he also
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Yes, _PySet_Next() is a good compromise for you and me -- it saves you from
writing a hack and saves my API from including a bug factory. The only issue
is
that Martin thinks it to be a crummy idea.
If it makes everyone happy, I shouldn't be in the way. Of course,
Brett Cannon wrote:
All of them are for function parameters of function pointers (``void
(*fn)(void)`` and such) when used in both function prototypes and
function declarations. Do we fix these ourselves, or do we report
them to the libffi maintainers (or are whom)?
If you don't have write
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 07:08:14PM +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
Josiah Carlson told me had has given up getting a Windows
buildbot running, because every time he installed VS.NET
on his machine, the installation would immediately crash.
So if anybody wants to
Neal Norwitz wrote:
The question is how to fix these. test_float and test_struct fail due
to a Floating Point Exception signal (SIGFPE).
I would hope that there is some way to control the floating point error
mode of the CPU (*). Changing it would be one option; Tim hopefully can
tell us
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:48:13PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
[Trent]
:)
Did you apply the Berkeley DB patches to your db-4.2.52 sources?
Ah, _which_ patches? As with my buildbot Wiki page, I write down
everything I do if there's a good chance I may need to do it again.
So, e.g., these
Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 07:08:14PM +0100, Thomas Heller wrote:
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
Josiah Carlson told me had has given up getting a Windows
buildbot running, because every time he installed VS.NET
on his machine, the installation would immediately crash.
So if
At 03:09 PM 3/30/2006 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
Well, here's how my use case would look if I had
class decorators:
@IOClass
class MyClass:
...
Does that count? My decorator wouldn't need any
arguments, because it looks inside the class for
all the information it needs. [1]
That's
On 3/29/06, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an ideal job for VMWare on an existing linux build machine if
someone can ante up a win xp and msvc++ license to the cause.
It probably isn't great from a practical point of view if you wanted
to run buildbot for both the server and
At 03:21 PM 3/30/2006 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:55, Greg Ewing wrote:
import db where db.stdlib == True and db.language == SQL \
and db.interface == DBAPI2.0
While we're at it, we could spell import select. :-)
Getting
See http://python.org/sf/1454485 for the gory details. Basically if
you create a unicode array (array.array('u')) and try to append an
8-bit string (ie, not unicode), you can crash the interpreter.
The problem is that the string is converted without question to a
unicode buffer. Within unicode,
At 11:09 PM 3/29/2006 -0500, Jack Diederich wrote:
I think we both want class decorators as a more fine grained substitute
for __metaclass__ (fine grained as in declared per-class-instance instead
of this-class-and-all-its-children). I can think of three ways class
decorators are used:
1)
The language choice should only be used as an argument if all else is
equal. Of course, hackability of a particular solution may be a
criterion too, and there the language choice could matter. But the
above response sounded like a knee-jerk to me, and IMO needs to be
rebutted.
--
--Guido
Hi Tim,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:45:10AM -0700, Tim Hochberg wrote:
Ouch. Assuming the same path is followed with tuples, I think that this
means the following behaviour will continue:
t = (1,2,3)
a = array([4,5,6])
t += a
t
array([5, 7, 9])
I fell into the same trap at
On 3/29/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll just point out that Atlassian has offered us free hosting for a
Jira/Confluence solution (plus svn and other stuff we may or may not
want). I personally support this option, but I know (and accept!) that
there are differing opinions.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:35:48PM +0200, Gerhard H?ring wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:47 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote:
My only concern about this is that it wouldn't be possible for other
authors to provide 3rd party packages as (for instance) db.mysqldb
because of
Greg Ewing wrote:
Firebird could be a solution to this. It can be
used in a mode that doesn't need a server, and it
has no trouble at all with concurrency or large
amounts of data that I know of.
so a library that doesn't support multiple independent readers/writers on
a single file at all
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:47:10PM +0200, Thomas Wouters wrote:
Con:
* Competing Python wrappers exist
* SQLite itself is updated frequently, let alone the wrappers
* Build integration risks unknown, possible delay of 2.5?
* Another external library to track and maybe have emergency
Hi Tim,
Oups, sorry. I only just realized my mistake and the meaning of your
message.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:27:02AM +0200, Armin Rigo wrote:
t = (1,2,3)
t += [4,5,6]
TypeError: can only concatenate tuple (not list) to tuple
t += array([4,5,6])
TypeError: ...
Neal Norwitz wrote:
I'm in favor of having Atlassian setup a system to be used for 3k. It
would be completely experimental and could be completely thrown away
which should be made clear to Atlassian if we were to do this. I
would use the system for evaluation.
so what's the advantage of a
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
