Ross Cohen wrote:
epoll also allows 64 bits of data to be tucked away and returned when events
happen. Could be useful for saving a dict lookup for every event. However,
there are some refcounting issues. Dict lookup per event could be traded
for one on deregistration. All it needs is a small
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Some time ago a warning was introduced for directories on sys.path
that don't contain an __init__.py but have the same name as a package/
module that is being imported.
Is it intentional that this triggers for toplevel imports? These
warnings are triggered in the
Greg Ewing wrote:
There are many different select-like things around now
(select, poll, epoll, kqueue -- are there others?) and
random combinations of them seem to be available on any
given platform. This makes writing platform-independent
code that needs select-like functionality very
Alex Martelli wrote:
Of course that would mean establishing which *was* the best available
which, as we've seen this week, may not be easy.
I believe it's: kqueue on FreeBSD ...
Such a statement assumes they are semantically equivalent. However, I
believe they aren't. A specific usage
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:36:12AM +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Ross Cohen wrote:
epoll also allows 64 bits of data to be tucked away and returned when events
happen. Could be useful for saving a dict lookup for every event. However,
there are some refcounting issues. Dict lookup per event
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:27:20AM +0100, Steve Holden wrote:
Greg Ewing wrote:
Rather than adding yet another platform-dependent module,
I'd like to see a unified Python interface in the stdlib
that uses whichever is the best one available.
Of course that would mean establishing which
Alex Martelli wrote:
On May 26, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
Of course that would mean establishing which *was* the best available
which, as we've seen this week, may not be easy.
I believe it's: kqueue on FreeBSD (for recent-enough versions
thereof), otherwise epoll where
Ross Cohen wrote:
The first thing any user of the poll interface does with the file descriptor
is map it to some state object. That's where the lookup can be saved, the
object can just be handed back directly. Problem being that when the fd is
unregistered, we won't get back the PyObject
http://wiki.python.org/moin/NeedForSpeed/Successes
http://wiki.python.org/moin/NeedForSpeed/Failures
http://wiki.python.org/moin/NeedForSpeed/Deferred
And
http://wiki.python.org/moin/ListOfPerformanceRelatedPatches
All of these are linked to from the top page:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Just end user experience's two cents here
(btw, this line is correct at English level?)
Since you asked...your question would be better written is this line
correct English?
And the line before, while not formal English of the kind needed, say, for
Decimal docs, works
Neal Norwitz wrote:
First off, good work to everyone involved. You did a tremendous job.
I just hope to hell you're done, because I can't keep up! :-)
Not quite done yet, but I will be encouraging the team to start wrapping
up in time to draw a line under everything that *isn't* going to
On Thu, May 25, 2006, Torsten Marek wrote:
Some open question remain:
- should iwindow return lists or tuples?
- what happens if the length of the iterable is smaller than the window size,
and no padding is specified? Is this an error? Should the generator return no
value at all or one
On Fri, May 26, 2006, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
and while we're at it, let's fix this:
0.66 * (1, 2, 3)
(1, 2)
and maybe even this
0.5 * (1, 2, 3)
(1, 1)
but I guess the latter one might need a pronunciation.
This should certainly get fixed in 3.0 thanks to
On May 26, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 5/26/06, martin.blais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Support for buffer protocol for socket and struct.
* Added socket.recv_buf() and socket.recvfrom_buf() methods, that
use the buffer
protocol (send and sendto already did).
*
On 27-mei-2006, at 8:49, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Some time ago a warning was introduced for directories on sys.path
that don't contain an __init__.py but have the same name as a
package/
module that is being imported.
Is it intentional that this triggers for
several string methods accepts either strings or objects that support
the buffer api, and ends up raising a expected a character buffer
object error if you pass in something else. this isn't exactly helpful
for non-experts -- the term character buffer object doesn't appear in
any python
Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some open question remain:
- should iwindow return lists or tuples?
- what happens if the length of the iterable is smaller than the
window size, and no padding is specified? Is this an error? Should
the generator return no value at all or one window that is too
Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some open question remain:
- should iwindow return lists or tuples?
- what happens if the length of the iterable is smaller than the
window size, and no padding is specified? Is this an error? Should
the generator return no value at all or one window that is too
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
several string methods accepts either strings or objects that support
the buffer api, and ends up raising a expected a character buffer
object error if you pass in something else. this isn't exactly helpful
for
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terry Reedy wrote:
Just end user experience's two cents here
(btw, this line is correct at English level?)
Since you asked...your question would be better written is this line
correct English?
And the line before,
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like there were a lot of additions to the string test suite,
that's great. I'm not sure if the other areas touched got similar
boosts to their tests. It would be good to upgrade all tests to
verify corner cases
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Just end user experience's two cents here
(btw, this line is correct at English level?)
Wouldn't it be still be conventional to have an article somewhere?
e.g. Just /some/ end user's two cents here
Or Just two cents' worth of end-user experience here,
which is almost
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some open question remain:
- should iwindow return lists or tuples?
- what happens if the length of the iterable is smaller than the
window size, and no padding is specified? Is this an error? Should
the generator return no value at all
From: Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A python-dev Google search for itertools window found me your original
suggestion to include Jack Diedrich's itertools.window in Python 2.3 (which
was only deferred because 2.3 was already past beta 1 at that point).
I couldn't find any discussion of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
