Actually, I meant that (among other things) it should be clarified that
it's alright to e.g. put .pyc and data files inside Python library
directories, and NOT okay to split them up.
Phillip, Just to be clear: I understand you are not in favour of
re-packaging data from python projects
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 23:19, Robin Bryce wrote:
python2.4 profile (pstats) etc, was removed due to licensing
issues rather than FHS. Should not be an issue for python2.5 but
what, in general, can a vendor do except break python if their
licensing policy cant accommodate all of pythons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
(The only other packaging thing like this that I'm aware of is
python-minimal in Ubuntu. This is done for installation purposes
and wacky dependency issues that occur when a fair chunk of the O/S
Talin schrieb:
To that extent, it can be useful sometimes to have someone who is in the
process of learning how to use the system, and who is willing to
carefully analyze and write down their own experiences while doing so.
I readily agree that the documentation can be improved, and applaud
Robin Bryce schrieb:
python2.4 profile (pstats) etc, was removed due to licensing issues
rather than FHS. Should not be an issue for python2.5 but what, in
general, can a vendor do except break python if their licensing policy
cant accommodate all of pythons batteries ?
If some vendor has a
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Talin schrieb:
To that extent, it can be useful sometimes to have someone who is in the
process of learning how to use the system, and who is willing to
carefully analyze and write down their own experiences while doing so.
I readily agree that the documentation
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm quite loathe to
install Cheeseshop packages into the system site-packages. I've had
Gentoo break occasionally when I did this for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm quite loathe to
install Cheeseshop
Ronald Oussoren schrieb:
On Friday, November 24, 2006, at 08:21PM, Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd like to ask for help with an issue which I do not know
how to solve.
Please see this bug http://python.org/sf/1563807
ctypes built with GCC on AIX 5.3 fails with ld ffi error
At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
thread. For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
own system Python for the OS to work properly, I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
thread. For distros like Gentoo or Ubuntu that rely heavily on their
own
I question whether a distro built on Python can even afford to allow
3rd party packages to be installed in their system's site-packages.
Maybe Python needs to extend its system-centric view of site-packages
with an application-centric and/or user-centric view of extensions?
Agreed,
On 11:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep thinking I'd like to treat the OS as just another application,
so that there's nothing special about it and the same infrastructure
could be used for other applications with lots of entry level scripts.
I agree. The motivation here is that the OS
At 06:41 PM 11/28/2006 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
thread. For distros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 01:05 PM 11/28/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a related issue that may or may not be in scope for this
thread. For distros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Well, you can always use setuptools, which generates script
wrappers that import the desired module and call a function, after
first setting up sys.path. :)
That's so 21st Century! Where
16 matches
Mail list logo
