On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:44, Anu Gupta DCSA wrote:
Dear Python Contributors,
I seek help from designers, developers, testers,defect
fixers,project managers or playing any other key role in
Free/Open Source software development or maintenence
in carrying out a study on practices and
Anthony Baxter schrieb:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 14:44, Anu Gupta DCSA wrote:
Dear Python Contributors,
I seek help from designers, developers, testers,defect
fixers,project managers or playing any other key role in
Free/Open Source software development or maintenence
in carrying out a
Anthony Baxter writes:
Just a random aside - is anyone else getting increasingly annoyed by
these mass-mailed out survey requests from students?
Annoyed, not particularly. Scared, yes: it's long been known that a
field=FIELD is moribund when people start getting PhDs in FIELD for
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
This one was at least personally addressed
(well, to Python Contributors), which is a step ahead of most of
them.
What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the respondents
aren't randomly selected -- they're the
amk ... no one has analyzed it; they're just *accumulating* the data.
amk It's stamp collecting as computer science.
+1 QOTF.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
This one was at least personally addressed
(well, to Python Contributors), which is a step ahead of most of
them.
What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the respondents
aren't randomly
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
This one was at least personally addressed
(well, to Python Contributors), which is a step ahead of most of
them.
What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the respondents
aren't randomly
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I don't like it. I would rather rely on the private _handle member.
If that ever gets changed, the test fails.
I made it using _handle.
Right now, we have test_socket_ssl.py using a local openssl and passing
all the tests in all the buildbots, :D
Thanks for your (you
Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| This guy, however, has been at it for over a month, this is his fourth
| (or so) mailing. I think an entry in the Mailman persona-non-grata
| list may be appropriate.
So would a letter/email to the chair of his/her
FWIW, I've checked a fix into the trunk. The code was waiting half a
second and assumign that the server thread was ready. This
occasionally failed of course. I fixed it by using an event variable
instead of a sleep call.
Not sure if it's worth backporting, as it is only a race condition in
the
On 4/4/07, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:07:18PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
This one was at least personally addressed
(well, to Python Contributors), which is a step ahead of most of
them.
What gets me is that such surveys are invalid because the
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Could you create an example where adding -framework to the end of the
command-line doesn't work?
I'll see what I can do.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Please stay out of the 2.5 branch unless you're one of the release
team - I'm cutting 2.5.1c1 at the moment. There will be a 2.5.1
final next week, assuming all goes well. If you have an urgent
bugfix you need in, please post here and get someone to approve it
before the checkin!
Thanks,
13 matches
Mail list logo
