Terry Reedy schrieb:
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Terry Reedy schrieb:
| How about asking a Python specific question, with answered filled in
rather
| that multiple choice selected: I would be willing to make up a bunch.
And I would spend
Georg Brandl writes:
By requesting a registration form over and over, and recording all
questions. A human would then answer them, which is easily done for
50 questions (provided that they are *not* targeted at experienced
Python programmers, which shouldn't be done).
We are not going to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen J.
Turnbull
ISTM you need one only question requiring human attention at a time,
because once a spammer assigns a human (or inhuman of equivalent
intelligence) to cracking you,
-Original Message-
ISTM you need one only question requiring human attention at a time,
because once a spammer assigns a human (or inhuman of equivalent
intelligence) to cracking you, you're toast.
I can't believe this is still profitable. It's either lucrative or
fulfilling,
Aaron Brady writes:
ISTM you need one only question requiring human attention at a time,
because once a spammer assigns a human (or inhuman of equivalent
intelligence) to cracking you, you're toast.
I can't believe this is still profitable. It's either lucrative or
fulfilling,
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:10 AM
To: Aaron Brady
Cc: 'Georg Brandl'; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
Aaron Brady writes:
ISTM you need one only question
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
This question I could not answer, because I don't know what an orb is
An orb is a sphere.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
-Original Message-
ISTM you need one only question requiring human attention at a time,
because once a spammer assigns a human (or inhuman of equivalent
intelligence) to cracking you, you're toast.
I can't believe this is still profitable. It's either
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The impression that many people (including python-dev regulars) have
| that there is a policy of support for both the current release
| (2.5) and the
Steve Holden wrote:
In which case doesn't it make more sense to use the existing mechanism
of PEP 356 (Release Schedule)? If something isn't listed in there (even
without dates) then there are no current plans to release it, and that
tells the reader everything they need to know.
At the
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
In which case doesn't it make more sense to use the existing mechanism
of PEP 356 (Release Schedule)? If something isn't listed in there
(even without dates) then there are no current plans to release it,
and that tells the reader everything they
Talin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
My underlying point: seeing porno spam on the practice site gave me a bad
itch both because I detest spammers in general and because I would not want
visitors turned off to Python by something that is completely out of place
and
My underlying point: seeing porno spam on the practice site gave me a bad
itch both because I detest spammers in general and because I would not want
visitors turned off to Python by something that is completely out of place
and potentially offensive to some. So I am willing to help us not
On Wed, May 16, 2007, Josiah Carlson wrote:
I'm not sure how effective the question/answer stuff is, but a bit of
javascript seems to be a good idea.
Just for the record (and to few people's surprise, I'm sure), I am
entirely opposed to any use of JavaScript.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thursday 17 May 2007, Aahz wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007, Josiah Carlson wrote:
I'm not sure how effective the question/answer stuff is, but a
bit of javascript seems to be a good idea.
Just for the record (and to few people's surprise, I'm sure), I
am entirely opposed to any use of
Typically spammers don't go through the effort to do a custom login
script for each different site. Instead, they do a custom login script
for each of the various software applications that support end-user
comments. So for example, there's a script for WordPress, and one for
PHPNuke, and so
Andrew McNamara wrote:
Typically spammers don't go through the effort to do a custom login
script for each different site. Instead, they do a custom login script
for each of the various software applications that support end-user
comments. So for example, there's a script for WordPress, and
However - once you knock these out, there is still a steady stream of
what are clearly human generated spams. The mind boggles at the economics
or desperation that make this worthwhile.
Actually, it doesn't cost that much, because typically the spammer can
trick other humans into doing their
18 matches
Mail list logo
