O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
:-) My idea was, a human got to answer it unscrambled as 'fourth' as he
understands what the question is and gives the proper answer.
Agreed, there could be confusion at first.
But for any given user, there's only going to be a first. Either they
pass the
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
You know, I've been a member of the Python community
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:23:46AM -0500, Jeff Rush wrote:
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
[snip]
4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
I don't have the necessary
While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
It is time to reject it due to lack of
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for the final decisions.
Positive Decisions (Marked Accepted
On 5/18/07, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for
On 5/18/07, Jeff Rush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
Jeff 1) How is the project governed? How does the community make
Jeffdecisions on what goes into a release?
JeffYou know, I've been a member of the Python community for many
Jeffyears -- I know about PEPs, Guido as BDFL, and +1/-1. But I've
Jeffnever figured
Brett Cannon schrieb:
4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
I don't have the necessary access to the pydotorg infrastructure
to answer this -- can someone who does help me out here?
According to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just haven't
gotten
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
SA 358 The bytes Object Schemenauer, GvR
SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() .items() GvR
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in
On 5/18/07, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just haven't
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
SA 358 The bytes Object Schemenauer, GvR
SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() .items() GvR
Not yet -- the implementations of these two
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
Not yet implemented, will be this weekend.
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Guido, can you tell me whether the concept of enums for Python is
being rejected, or this specific proposal? My proposal would be
quite different, and I think, more Pythonic. Should I bother
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both , and as in
except statements?
I think 'except as' should
Guido van Rossum wrote:
While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
This kind of
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both ,
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and patches need to contain URLs, except for
| specialized
On 5/18/07, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2). Logically
equivalent to not s1.intersection(s2) but has an early-out if a common member
is found. The speed-up is potentially large given two big sets that may
largely overlap or
On 18-May-07, at 6:34 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
Logically equivalent to not s1.intersection(s2) but has an early-
out if a common member is found. The speed-up is
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
| Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
| hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
| it
Terry Reedy writes:
Why not simply embargo any post with an off-site link? Tho there might
have been some, I can't remember a single example of such at SF.
Fine by me; if it doesn't happen often, then embargoing them would be
fine. My occasional experience with distro reporting processes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen J.
Turnbull
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:10 AM
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
:-) My idea was, a human
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
Logically equivalent to not s1.intersection(s2) but has an early-out
if a common member is found. The speed-up is potentially large
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond
Hettinger
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:35 PM
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: [Python-Dev] Py2.6 buildouts to the set API
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New
28 matches
Mail list logo
