ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/14/08 - 11/21/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2194 open (+35) / 14007 closed (+18) / 16201 total (+53)
Open issues with patches: 728
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Let's try this for 3.0rc4 then.
The current release is rc2. Skipping rc3 would confuse people'-)
Yeah, my calendar was wrong, but the PEP (and more importantly...
code!) was right :).
There
A trick we added to 2.6 that users seem to not notice is that it is now
possible to execute zipfiles and directories from the command line by
including a __main__.py module (that module will then be executed, but
more importantly, the zipfile or directory name will be added to the
beginning of
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A trick we added to 2.6 that users seem to not notice is that it is now
possible to execute zipfiles and directories from the command line by
including a __main__.py module (that module will then be executed, but
more
Ok, now I'm implementing __format__ support for IronPython. The format spec
mini-language docs say that a presentation type of None is the same as 'g' for
floating point / decimal values. But these two formats seem to differ based
upon how they handle whole numbers:
2.0.__format__('')
'2.0'
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I am
happy to announce the third and last planned release candidate for Python
3.0.
Whoohoo! :) Great works
Dino Viehland wrote:
Ok, now I'm implementing __format__ support for IronPython. The format spec mini-language docs say that a presentation type of None is the same as 'g' for floating point / decimal values.
Awesome! Thanks for doing this.
But these two formats seem to differ based upon
Unless this is considered a regression...
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it crosses the line.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a release manager call on whether or not the proposed resolution
of
I don't think that removing an unintentional and subtly broken feature
is a regression.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Lisandro Dalcin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless this is considered a regression...
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it
In concur that it is not a regression (esp for Py2.6).
OTOH, it would be nice to have -m run as expected.
It seems reasonable to me to get this working for 3.0.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lisandro Dalcin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nick
10 matches
Mail list logo
