On 7/25/09 7:11 AM, Neil Hodgson wrote:
Martin v. Löwis:
I propose to add another (regular) double into the union.
Adding a regular double as a second dummy gives the same sizes and
alignments with Mingw or MSVC as the original definition with MSVC:
Great (checked that, too)
This
Christian Tismer wrote:
We should keep Martin's hint in mind, that Python 4 could place
the gc header at the end of structures, instead.
Wow, 3.1 just came out and we already have the first PEP for Python 4k? :)
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Joshua Haberman wrote:
This is not as bad as having someone
set __class__ on one of my instances, or set attributes on my type, etc.
Is there any real need to prevent someone from doing
those things?
My ultimate goal is to make my types
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:18:25 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
[1] on
my part) and sysadmin goals (something that works and plays nicely
with the rest of the system).
pythonpkgmgr seems entirely oblivious to the latter issue, and not
particularly compatible with the way
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:23:59 +0100, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
It would be great to have a decent visual package manager for Python.
Hopefully one day we'll have one - haha
It needs to be built on top of the work that Tarek is doing with
distutils (and be compatible
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David Lyondavid.l...@preisshare.net wrote:
My only point is that Windows ain't no embedded system. It's not
short on memory or disk space. If a package manager is 5 megabytes
extra say, with it's libraries.. what's the extra download time on
that ? compared to
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:29:14 +0900, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
My only point is that Windows ain't no embedded system. It's not
short on memory or disk space. If a package manager is 5 megabytes
extra say, with it's libraries.. what's the extra download time on
that ? compared
David Lyon writes:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:18:25 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
[1] on
my part) and sysadmin goals (something that works and plays nicely
with the rest of the system).
pythonpkgmgr seems entirely oblivious to the latter issue, and not
Hello,
Since there was a bit of confusion last time, I'll start by saying I am
working on the subprocess.Popen module for Google Summer of Code. One of the
features I am implementing is a class so that a running process can stand in
in place of a file. For examples, instead of open( filelist,
On 7/27/09 12:48 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Christian Tismer wrote:
We should keep Martin's hint in mind, that Python 4 could place
the gc header at the end of structures, instead.
Wow, 3.1 just came out and we already have the first PEP for Python 4k? :)
Christian
Maybe it's even
On 7/24/09 5:16 AM, Roumen Petrov wrote:
Christian Tismer wrote:
...
Did the crash disappear is you add __attribute__((aligned(8))) after
variable dummy ?
Did not try. But the proposed addition of a double does it,
see the dev list.
cheers - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^)
2009/7/27 Eric Pruitt eric.pru...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Since there was a bit of confusion last time, I'll start by saying I am
working on the subprocess.Popen module for Google Summer of Code. One of the
features I am implementing is a class so that a running process can stand in
in place of a
Paul Moore wrote:
2009/7/27 Eric Pruitt eric.pru...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Since there was a bit of confusion last time, I'll start by saying I am
working on the subprocess.Popen module for Google Summer of Code. One of the
features I am implementing is a class so that a running process can stand
I am implementing the file wrapper using changes to subprocess.Popen that
also make it asynchronous and non-blocking so implementing r+ should be
trivial to do. How about handling stderr? I have the following ideas: leave
out support for reading from stderr, make it so that there is an optional
2009/7/27 Eric Pruitt eric.pru...@gmail.com:
I am implementing the file wrapper using changes to subprocess.Popen that
also make it asynchronous and non-blocking so implementing r+ should be
trivial to do. How about handling stderr? I have the following ideas: leave
out support for reading
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:30 am MRAB wrote:
What about stderr? You could add e if you want to read from it.
Read from stderr is just a read. Write to stderr is just a write.
The difference between reading stdout and stderr is not that you have
different modes, but that you are reading from
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:30 am MRAB wrote:
What about stderr? You could add e if you want to read from it.
Read from stderr is just a read. Write to stderr is just a write.
The difference between reading stdout and stderr is not that you have
different modes, but
Joshua Haberman wrote:
Python as a language has chosen to lock down built-in
objects... If it's
important for the built-in types, why should it be less important for
mine?
I'm not really sure why so much trouble is taken to lock
down builtin types -- it seems to go against Python's
general
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:06:45 am Eric Pruitt wrote:
I am implementing the file wrapper using changes to subprocess.Popen
that also make it asynchronous and non-blocking so implementing r+
should be trivial to do. How about handling stderr? I have the
following ideas: leave out support for
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I like MRAB's idea of using a (non-standard) e flag to include
stderr. So r reads from stdout, re reads from stdout+stderr.
Anything more complicated probably should just use raw Popen
objects. Don't overcomplicate the
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:12:54 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Not you; pythonpkgmgr. You've said nothing about how pythonpkgmgr is
supposed to deal with multiple installed versions of Python
Under windows it can deal with multiple versions of python. You just
go to options
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:31:40 +0200, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
If they read examples, they will see import
statements, and then they have to find out how to make those work.
Does your tool help with that?
Yes. It will open the website or homepage to the project/package
in
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:33:37 +0200, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
pythonpkgmgr is not so different to that. And the idea behind it is
to bring consistancy in package management across the different
platforms.
At the cost of being inconsistent within a platform.
It has the most
David Lyon writes:
It manages local developer modules for python 2.6+.
pythonpkgmgr is aimed at featherweight users.
You were talking about developers, but now they're featherweight
users? I'm sorry, but the more you post, the less I like the idea of
including it with Python. Please do
I just started a new job today, and I've got a bunch of other stuff going
on in my life, so I'm setting python-dev and python-ideas to nomail for
a while. Please feel free to ping me directly if you want.
I'll be back.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) *
pythonpkgmgr is not so different to that. And the idea behind it is
to bring consistancy in package management across the different
platforms.
At the cost of being inconsistent within a platform.
It has the most generic of user interfaces.
[...]
So I respectfully say that there
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:12:25 +0200, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
So there are now two incompatible ways to install a package:
either with the native manager, or with pythonpkgmgr. If you install
them one way, and try to remove them the other way, you lose.
pythonpkgmgr is only a
So there are now two incompatible ways to install a package:
either with the native manager, or with pythonpkgmgr. If you install
them one way, and try to remove them the other way, you lose.
pythonpkgmgr is only a thin wrapper for easy_install/pip.
If there is a problem, then it is
28 matches
Mail list logo
