On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:14:05 pm Stefan Behnel wrote:
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com writes:
IMO, its only virtue is that people coming from functional
languages are used to having compose. Otherwise, it's a YAGNI.
Then I wonder how partial() ended up in the
This is a repost from two weeks ago. It didn't get much feedback last
time. I still keep trying, reposting to python-list also this time.
In this thread, I'd like to collect things that ought to be done
but where Dirkjan has indicated that he would prefer if somebody else
did it.
Item 1
--
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:12, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
In this thread, I'd like to collect things that ought to be done
but where Dirkjan has indicated that he would prefer if somebody else
did it.
I think the most important item here is currently the win32text stuff.
Mark
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Bolendb3l@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk writes:
Is the Express Edition of Visual C++ 2008 suitable for compiling
packages for Python 2.6 on Windows?
(And Python 2.6 itself for that matter...)
Yes - it's currently being used
On 18/08/2009 6:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:12, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
In this thread, I'd like to collect things that ought to be done
but where Dirkjan has indicated that he would prefer if somebody else
did it.
I think the most important item
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:32, Mark Hammondmhamm...@skippinet.com.au wrote:
I can make time, somewhat spasmodically, starting fairly soon. Might I
suggest that as a first task I can resurrect my old stale patch, and you can
arrange to install win32text locally and start experimenting with how
[stripping out python-list and Mark from the CC]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:20, Dirkjan Ochtmandirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:12, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
In this thread, I'd like to collect things that ought to be done
but where Dirkjan has indicated that
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 21:46, Brett Cannonbr...@python.org wrote:
Can we possibly get these todo items in the PEP? I keep looking at the
PEP out of habit to see what the blockers are and they are not there,
at which point I have to dig up Martin's email.
Will do.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Howdy folks,
I have a first draft of a PEP for including an IP address manipulation
library in the python stdlib. It seems like there are a lot of really
smart folks with some, ahem, strong ideas about what an IP address
module should and shouldn't be so I wanted to solicit your input on
this
http://ipaddr-py.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.0.x/ipaddr.py :
def IP(address, host=False, version=None):
Take an IP string/int and return an object of the correct type.
Args:
ip_str: ...
The arg is 'address', not 'ip_str'.
There are two classes, IPv4 and IPv6 whose
Ditto for 2.5, 3.1 and the trunk (which I guess becomes 3.2?)
2.5 needs VS 2003.
The 64 bits version of 2.5 is built with VS 2005, though.
Not really - it is built with the compiler in the platform SDK.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:53:36PM -0700, Peter Moody wrote:
hold over from when I was trying to be too fancy. fixed as well.
Thank you. The PEP and the code is Ok for me. Something like this should
be in the stdlib. Currently I'm using IPy.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
The second item is line conversion hooks. Dj Gilcrease has posted a
solution which he considers a hack himself. Mark Hammond has also
volunteered, but it seems some volunteer needs to be in charge,
keeping track of a
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Oleg Broytmannp...@phd.pp.ru wrote:
http://ipaddr-py.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.0.x/ipaddr.py :
def IP(address, host=False, version=None):
Take an IP string/int and return an object of the correct type.
Args:
ip_str: ...
The arg is
14 matches
Mail list logo
