Am 13.01.2010 21:27, schrieb Lennart Regebro:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 21:08, Oleg Broytman p...@phd.pp.ru wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:50:59PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
What do you need to do in the PYTHONSTARTUP file?
Ten years of Python programming, and I didn't even know it
-On [20100113 22:13], Ralf Schmitt (r...@brainbot.com) wrote:
hehe. tab completion:
With bpython and ipython available, why would you even want to stick to the
'plain old' interactive interpreter?
(Sorry to derail the discussion, but maybe there's more people that have not
heard of either or
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai at in-nomine.org writes:
-On [20100113 22:13], Ralf Schmitt (ralf at brainbot.com) wrote:
hehe. tab completion:
With bpython and ipython available, why would you even want to stick to the
'plain old' interactive interpreter?
Why wouldn't we?
There are
ERESSEA Lord evzp24
; TIMESTAMP 1263675732032
; Magellan Version 2.0.4 (build 361)
; ECHECK -r100 -s -l -w4 -v4.3.2
LOCALE de
REGION -2,0 ; Rlyeh
; ECheck Lohn 11
EINHEIT umwc; Pyrit Eisenbeisser [2,0$]
// Zwerg: Bergmann
LERNEN Bergbau
EINHEIT 4fh4; Beryllium [2,771$]
//
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org writes:
-On [20100113 22:13], Ralf Schmitt (r...@brainbot.com) wrote:
hehe. tab completion:
With bpython and ipython available, why would you even want to stick
to the 'plain old' interactive interpreter?
Because those optional extras are
Ben Finney wrote:
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org writes:
-On [20100113 22:13], Ralf Schmitt (r...@brainbot.com) wrote:
hehe. tab completion:
With bpython and ipython available, why would you even want to stick
to the 'plain old' interactive interpreter?
Because those
I've recently seen a couple of references to 3.1.2 go by in checkins
which made me wonder whether dates have been proposed yet for updates to
either 3.1 or 2.6. I don't recall seeing any and I didn't see any
references in the PEPs. Some advance warning would be nice. I assume
that some
Ned Deily wrote:
I've recently seen a couple of references to 3.1.2 go by in checkins
which made me wonder whether dates have been proposed yet for updates to
either 3.1 or 2.6. I don't recall seeing any and I didn't see any
references in the PEPs. Some advance warning would be nice. I
Good lord, did this make it past other people's spam filters too? I
especially liked the reference to REGION -2,0 ; Rlyeh. Ph'nglui
mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn to you too sir.
-Jack
2010/1/16 Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de:
ERESSEA Lord evzp24
; TIMESTAMP 1263675732032
;
Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com writes:
Good lord, did this make it past other people's spam filters too? I
especially liked the reference to REGION -2,0 ; Rlyeh. Ph'nglui
mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn to you too sir.
Finally, we have the coordinates: “REGION -2,0”. I kept
2010/1/16 Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com:
Good lord, did this make it past other people's spam filters too? I
especially liked the reference to REGION -2,0 ; Rlyeh. Ph'nglui
mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn to you too sir.
Ya made it past mine too, it looks like a debug dump of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
