Your problem is easily explained however: the second argument to
p.findall() should be an offset, not a flag set. (You are confusing
re.findall() and p.findall().)
I filed a doc bug for this:
http://bugs.python.org/issue8785
Cheers,
Hagen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has
discussed
on-and-off for several months on both stdlib-sig and python-dev.
I think any time till the
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has
discussed
on-and-off
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
Except that
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri, May 21,
On Sat, 22 May 2010 10:09:37 -0400, Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wr=
ote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wr=
ote:
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri,
On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan
br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
Except that now isn't the time for that
I think the PEP's overall API is good to go.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote:
If there is still discussion then perhaps the PEP isn't ready for
pronouncement yet. At some point someone can decide it is
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
Rename executor = executer
-1 for consistency with Java.
Rename submit to apply
apply focuses attention on the function object, while submit
focuses attention, properly I think, on the fact that you're handing
something
Hey all,
Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep
discussion open for a few more days.
So fire away!
Cheers,
Brian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
On May 23, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
I think the PEP's overall API is good to go.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
On 22 May 2010, at 23:59, R. David Murray wrote:
If there is still discussion then perhaps the PEP isn't ready for
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com wrote:
Hey all,
Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep
discussion open for a few more days.
So fire away!
Man, everyone's faster on the email thing lately than me :)
Yes, I spoke to Brian, and
On May 23, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com
wrote:
Rename executor = executer
-1 for consistency with Java.
-1 pending an explanation of why executer is better
Rename submit to apply
apply focuses attention
On May 22, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Brian Quinlan wrote:
Jesse, the designated pronouncer for this PEP, has decided to keep discussion
open for a few more days.
So fire away!
As you wish!
The PEP should be consistent in its usage of terminology about callables. It
alternately calls them
14 matches
Mail list logo
