Steven D'Aprano, 03.07.2010 06:35:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:39:07 am Greg Ewing wrote:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
So, would it still be Python if it folded
1 + 1
into
raise TypeError()
at compile time?
It would have to be
raise TypeError(Exactly the message that would have been
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Reid Kleckner reid.kleck...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm trying to test out a patch to add a timeout in subprocess.py on
Windows, so I need to build Python with Visual Studio. The docs say
the files in PCBuild/ work with VC 9 and newer. I downloaded Visual
I'm trying to test out a patch to add a timeout in subprocess.py on
Windows, so I need to build Python with Visual Studio. The docs say
the files in PCBuild/ work with VC 9 and newer.
Which docs did you look at specifically that said and newer? That
would be a bug.
I downloaded Visual
C++
Steve Holden writes:
If the wave were to result in good documentation about how to *get*
ready that would be an amazingly useful contribution.
I'm a coauthor of PEP 374 and of http://emacswiki.org/BzrForEmacsDevs.
I think that I can have a document adapted from the Python dev FAQ,
possibly
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the
moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144
I've just made http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 a release blocker too,
I'm afraid. It's a potential security
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:17:16 +0100
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the
moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144
I've just made
Brett Cannon writes:
Mercurial has subrepo support, but that doesn't justify the need to
have every module in its own repository so they can be checked out
individually.
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules. So, eg, in order
to work on recent urllib, maybe you need a recent *but stable* email
but you
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
This is just a note that we have one bug blocking 2.7 final at the
moment: http://bugs.python.org/issue9144
I added Jesse to the nosy list for
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you
can mix and match *known versions* of the modules. So, eg, in order
to
Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 14:26:53, Victor Stinner a écrit :
In the worst case, a function rejects valid data. If I have to choose, I
prefer to reject valid data than a security vulnerability. But audioop has
tests and I don't think that my patch breaks anything :-)
I checked the test suite:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 14:40:57 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Le samedi 03 juillet 2010 14:26:53, Victor Stinner a écrit :
In the worst case, a function rejects valid data. If I have to choose, I
prefer to reject valid data than a security vulnerability. But audioop has
Am 03.07.2010 09:00, schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
I'm trying to test out a patch to add a timeout in subprocess.py on
Windows, so I need to build Python with Visual Studio. The docs say
the files in PCBuild/ work with VC 9 and newer.
Which docs did you look at specifically that said and newer?
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'm trying to test out a patch to add a timeout in subprocess.py on
Windows, so I need to build Python with Visual Studio. The docs say
the files in PCBuild/ work with VC 9 and newer.
Which docs did you look at
Am 03.07.2010 01:54, schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
I don't know about try -- personally I don't see a difference for
the release procedure, no matter where the source comes from.
I guess you haven't done a release yet, then :-)
That's possible :)
Assuming you are going to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Can somebody comment on how much ongoing effort is required to keep that
mirror running?
As everybody else indicated: none (I believe).
OK, cool. I have certainly had no issues using it when working as a
non-committer to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 02.07.2010 15:09, schrieb Fred Drake:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
The two sets of repositories use different conversion tools and rules.
They have nothing in common (different
On 7/3/2010 10:34 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Which docs did you look at specifically that said and newer? That
would be a bug.
The readme.txt in the PCbuild directory contains the sentence Microsoft
Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition is required at the very least. The
wording could be
On 7/3/2010 12:36 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I would say that using the SVN mirror is a fine way to experiment with
using hg against the Python sources to develop and test patches. Here
is the setup I have used for work against trunk (I have a parallel pair
of repositories for the release2.6-maint
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 14:16:08 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
This is perhaps a naive question, but hat do you gain with the
intermediate mirror clone of upstream? (Other than filling more of your
disk?)
Filling less of your disk, actually, since local clones use hardlinks.
Also,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Terry Reedy wrote:
This is perhaps a naive question, but hat do you gain with the
intermediate mirror clone of upstream? (Other than filling more of your
disk?)
I gain having my local changes be in a scratchpad repsitory, which I
can discard at
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- - Create a pristine clone of the trunk (one where I never commit any
changes):
$ cd $python_repo
$ hg clone http://code.python.org/hg/trunk/ pytrunk-upstream
- - Create a local clone from that repository:
$
Am 03.07.2010 16:34, schrieb Christian Heimes:
Am 03.07.2010 09:00, schrieb Martin v. Löwis:
I'm trying to test out a patch to add a timeout in subprocess.py on
Windows, so I need to build Python with Visual Studio. The docs say
the files in PCBuild/ work with VC 9 and newer.
Which docs did
I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why
someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other.
I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't choose either one.
Just sit back and wait for the real migration to happen.
I would say that using the SVN mirror is a
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:51:58 +0200
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why
someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other.
I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't choose either one.
Just sit back and
This is perhaps a naive question, but hat do you gain with the
intermediate mirror clone of upstream? (Other than filling more of your
disk?)
In addition to the answer you got: this way of working is also the
process that I arrived at, independently.
I see two uses, both based around the
My question is basically the same as Terry Reedy's, but I'm going to
phrase it a bit differently:
This is perhaps a naive question, but why do you create a second local
clone instead of just creating a branch?
IIUC, if you create a named branch, the branch will become globally
visible when
Am 04.07.2010 00:56, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:51:58 +0200
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why
someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other.
I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't
2, throwing away local changes is not that easy in Mercurial,
if you have committed them already. There are extensions to
uncommit, but they are discouraged and have limitations. So it's
best to throw away everything and start over fresh, which is
faster if you have a pristine
That tutorial is not ~100 pages. It's actually a good tutorial.
That's why I posted it here, but it still 80 pages in my browser.
Perhaps you meant 80 screens, or a different tutorial. hginit is a short
tutorial useful for Subversion users who don’t have the time to read the
hgbook.
Regards
30 matches
Mail list logo
