On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 21.02.2011 08:41, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello
Now that Python 3.2 is out, I am planning to do the following with
Distutils2:
1 - release a new alpha before Pycon for community feedback
2 - add distutils2 back in the
As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following
PEPs from being marked Final?
SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard
SA 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip
SA 3108 Standard Library Reorganization
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following
PEPs from being marked Final?
SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard
SA 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For
An associated bug report would be appreciated (mailing list
discussions are useful for raising awareness, but are more likely to
be forgotten over time than bug reports): http://bugs.python.org
Just did that; thanks!
-- Hoyt
+ Hoyt Koepke
+
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 00:02, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 21.02.2011 08:41, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hello
Now that Python 3.2 is out, I am planning to do the following with
Distutils2:
1 - release a new
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:52, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following
PEPs from being marked Final?
SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard
SA 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
...
- distutils2 will continue to be released as a standalone project from
2.4 to 3.2. Probably by using 3to2, but I have not tried the tool yet.
So does this mean that primary development will move to py3k and then
you
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following
PEPs from being marked Final?
SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing
Hi,
I was wondering if there is some reason why C API functions like
PyObject_CallMethod[1] and PySys_GetObject[2] take char* arguments
rather than const char*s? If there is some reason these methods will
modify their string arguments, it would be nice if it was documented,
because at the moment
Le 21/02/2011 22:55, antoine.pitrou a écrit :
Author: antoine.pitrou
Date: Mon Feb 21 22:55:48 2011
New Revision: 88484
Log:
Issue #10826: Prevent sporadic failure in test_subprocess on Solaris due
to open door files.
if __name__ == __main__:
-print(','.join(str(fd) for fd in
The original message was received at Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:29:51 +0700
from pancaprima.com [196.86.11.104]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
python-dev@python.org
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Hi,
I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version:
i) Demo directory removed
ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1 changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1
Would someone tell me why ?
Thanks at advance.
wen
___
Python-Dev mailing
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 21:02, wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version:
i) Demo directory removed
From the What's new in 3.2 document: The unmaintained Demo directory has
been removed. Some demos were integrated into
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:02 PM, wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version:
i) Demo directory removed
ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1 changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1
Would someone tell me why ?
The demo directory
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version:
i) Demo directory removed
ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1 changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1
Others have answered your first question, but the
15 matches
Mail list logo
