On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:39 +0100, Xavier Morel wrote:
On 2011-12-09, at 19:15 , Bill Janssen wrote:
I use ElementTree for parsing valid XML, but minidom for producing it.
Could you expand on your reasons to use minidom for producing XML?
To throw my 2c in here:
I personally normally use
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi man...@gmx.net wrote:
IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD
BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY THAT IT'S SIMPLY NOT GO'NNA HAPPEN,
THAT WHO DOESN'T LIKE IT IS FREE TO CHOOSE
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi man...@gmx.net wrote:
IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD
BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY
Hi Cedric,
On 12/09/2011 09:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
It is widely known among the programmer's community that spaces and tabs
are remarkably similar to eachother. So similar even, that people fight
wars about which to use in a non-py context. It might strike one as an
equally remarkably
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
This just gave me the idea of tagging tracebacks with the Python version
number. Something like
Traceback (Py3.2.2, most recent call last):
and perhaps with the platform also
Traceback (most recent call last) [Py3.2.2 on
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/9/2011 5:17 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
As Chris pointed out though, the real problem with the repeatedly run
2to3 workflow is that it can make interpreting tracebacks from the
field *really* hard.
This just gave me the idea of tagging tracebacks with the Python version
10.12.11 13:14, francis написав(ла):
Formatting is like food, everyone has it's own taste. One has
to use spicery to change it (if possible). For me the view of
the code (the layout) by the programmer should be automatically
changed by the tool that reads the code. Here you could have
a python
On 2011-12-10, at 12:14 , francis wrote:
(I thing that 'go' has some
autoformater or a standard way of formatting).
`gofmt` yes, it simply reformats all the code to match the style
decided by the core go team, it does not provide support formatting-
independent edition.
Think of it as pep8.py
Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Bill Janssen, 09.12.2011 19:15:
I think another thing that might go into refreshing the batteries is a
feature comparison of BeautifulSoup and HTML5lib against the stdlib
competition, to see what needs to be added/revised. Having to switch to
an
On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Note, however, that html5lib is likely way too big to add it to the stdlib,
and that BeautifulSoup lacks a parser for non-conforming HTML in Python 3,
which would be the target release series for better HTML support. So,
whatever library or
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 13:15, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Cedric Sodhi man...@gmx.net wrote:
IF YOU THINK YOU MUST REPLY SOMETHING WITTY, ITERATE THAT THIS HAD
BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE, REPLY THAT
On 12/10/2011 12:09 PM, PJ Eby wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
This just gave me the idea of tagging tracebacks with the Python
version number. Something like
Traceback (Py3.2.2, most recent call last):
and
On 12/10/2011 12:52 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/9/2011 5:17 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
As Chris pointed out though, the real problem with the repeatedly run
2to3 workflow is that it can make interpreting tracebacks from the
field *really* hard.
This just gave me the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Working in the DTRACE probes, I think I can simplify the build logic
quite a bit using the GNU Makefile conditional execution:
https://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/make/Conditional-Syntax.html.
In concrete, I have object files that must be compiled and
On 12/10/2011 4:32 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Note, however, that html5lib is likely way too big to add it to the
stdlib, and that BeautifulSoup lacks a parser for non-conforming HTML
in Python 3, which would be the target release series for
I don't know how widespread gmake is, but I certainly don't want Python to
be dependent on GNU tools exclusively. You don't have to use GCC to compile
it. (Autoconfig is a different story, it only is needed when
config.inchanges. Similar, readline is optional.)
--Guido
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at
On Dec 10, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
A little data: the HTML5lib project lives at
https://code.google.com/p/html5lib/
It has 4 owners and 22 other committers.
The most recent release, html5lib 0.90 for Python, is nearly 2 years old.
Since there is a separate Python3
On 12/10/2011 9:25 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Dec 10, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
A little data: the HTML5lib project lives at
https://code.google.com/p/html5lib/
It has 4 owners and 22 other committers.
If there really are 4 'owners' rather than 4 people with admin access to
18 matches
Mail list logo
