Hi!
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:32:27PM -0500, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the same in Chrome on my Mac.
Skip
On Sep 1, 2014 8:00 PM, John Wong gokoproj...@gmail.com wrote:
As of today I still am getting untrusted cert thought I would re-ping to
see if there is
On 2 September 2014 07:17, Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk wrote:
(The program handles SIGTERM so that it can do a bit of cleanup before
exiting, and it uses the signal-handler-sets-a-flag technique. The call
that might be interrupted is sleep(), so the program doesn't strictly
On 2 September 2014 10:34, John Wong gokoproj...@gmail.com wrote:
As of today I still am getting untrusted cert thought I would re-ping to see
if there is an ETA.
Thanks for the ping - I got sidetracked by other things, and didn't
follow up on this one. I've kicked things into motion again, and
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:17:33 + (UTC)
Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk wrote:
If such applications exist, they are not portable and are subject to
race conditions (deadlock if the signal comes before the system call).
The program is certainly not portable (which is not any kind
On 9/2/2014 1:49 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:32:27PM -0500, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the same in Chrome on my Mac.
Skip
On Sep 1, 2014 8:00 PM, John Wong gokoproj...@gmail.com wrote:
As of today I still am getting untrusted cert
On Aug 29, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Disabling verification entirely externally to the program, through a CLI flag
or environment variable. I'm pretty down on this idea, the problem you hit is
that it's a pretty blunt instrument to swing, and it's almost
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 September 2014 07:17, Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk wrote:
(The program handles SIGTERM so that it can do a bit of cleanup before
exiting, and it uses the signal-handler-sets-a-flag technique. The call
that might be interrupted is
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk wrote:
(The program handles SIGTERM so that it can do a bit of cleanup before
exiting, and it uses the signal-handler-sets-a-flag technique. The call
that might be interrupted is sleep(), so the program doesn't
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:14:25PM -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 9/2/2014 1:49 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:32:27PM -0500, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the same in Chrome on my Mac.
Skip
On Sep 1, 2014 8:00 PM, John Wong
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:00:02 -0700
Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
I would strongly recommend against such a mechanism.
For what it's worth, Twisted simply unconditionally started verifying
certificates in 14.0 with no disable switch, and (to my knowledge)
literally no
2014-09-02 23:02 GMT+02:00 Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk:
I think people who use sleep() in their programs could benefit from not
having to worry about EINTR as much as anyone else.
The behaviour of time.sleep() is worse than what I expected. On UNIX,
if select() fails with EINTR,
2014-09-02 23:03 GMT+02:00 Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk:
In any case I think PEP 475 should be explaining what is going to happen
to signal.siginterrupt(). Will setting flag=True be supported?
I first proposed to deprecate the function, but Charles-François
thinks that it's
On 1 Sep 2014 16:05, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
The final change would be to seed the context factory map
appropriately for the standard library modules where we wanted to keep
the *old* default:
for modname in (nntplib, poplib, imaplib, ftplib,
smtplib,
Hi,
I'm using Python buildbots to ensure that my changes don't fail on
some platform. It's important for changes close to the operation
system. The problem is that many buildbots are ill.
Before, only a few buildbots had sporadic failures. Now most buildbots
are always fail (are red).
Here is
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net writes:
And how many people are using Twisted as an HTTPS client?
(compared to e.g. Python's httplib, and all the third-party libraries
building on it?)
I don't think anyone could give an honest estimate of these counts, however
there's two factors to
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:16:18 + (UTC)
Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Furthermore, disable verification is a nonsensical thing to do with TLS.
It's not. For example, if you have an expired cert, all you can do
AFAIK is to disable verification.
It really is a nonsensical
On 02.09.2014 23:32, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Furthermore, disable verification is a nonsensical thing to do with TLS.
It's not. For example, if you have an expired cert, all you can do
AFAIK is to disable verification.
It's possible to ignore or just warn about expired certs with simple
verify
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a
On 3 Sep 2014 08:18, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net writes:
And how many people are using Twisted as an HTTPS client?
(compared to e.g. Python's httplib, and all the third-party libraries
building on it?)
I don't think anyone could
On 3 Sep 2014 09:00, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
From a completely different perspective, does anyone have experience
with using BuildBot with OpenStack hosted clients? We may be able to take
advantage of the PSF's
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com writes:
Creating *new* incompatibilities between Python 2 Python 3 is a major point
of concern.
Clearly this change should be backported to Python2.
-David
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:16:18 -, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
This whole scenario seems to be predicated on a siutation where: You have a
peer whose certificate you can't change, and you have a piece of code you
can't
change, and you're going to upgrade your Python
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 08:18, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net writes:
And how many people are using Twisted as an HTTPS client?
(compared to e.g. Python's httplib, and all
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com writes:
Creating *new* incompatibilities between Python 2 Python 3 is a major
point
of concern.
Clearly this change should be backported to Python2.
Proposing to break backwards compatibility in a
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com writes:
Creating *new* incompatibilities between Python 2 Python 3 is a major
point
of concern.
Clearly this change
On Sep 2, 2014, at 7:47 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org mailto:dr...@dreid.org
wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
On 03Sep2014 00:13, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
AMD64 Snow Leop 3.x: many tests are not reliable (stable) on this
platform. For example, test_logging.test_race() sometimes fail with
PermissionError(1, Operation not permitted:
'/tmp/test_logging-3-bjulw8iz.log'). Another
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:47:35 -0700
Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com writes:
Creating *new* incompatibilities
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:13:22 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
AMD64 Snow Leop 3.x: many tests are not reliable (stable) on this
platform. For example, test_logging.test_race() sometimes fail with
PermissionError(1, Operation not permitted:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:53:51 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 08:15, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
x86 RHEL 6 3.x: TestReadline.test_init() fails, issue #19884. I don't
have to this platform, I don't know how to fix it.
Sorry, I haven't been a
On 9/2/2014 7:47 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org
mailto:dr...@dreid.org wrote:
Clearly this change should be backported to Python2.
Proposing to break
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:59:54 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 9/2/2014 7:47 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org
mailto:dr...@dreid.org
Antoine Pitrou writes:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:47:35 -0700
Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
As we keep saying, this is not a break in backwards
compatibility, it's a bug fix.
Keeping saying it doesn't make it magically true.
It's not magically true, it is just true.
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not, I can ask Luke to do it).
Alternatively, CentOS 6 may exhibit the same problem.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not,
Hello all
I don't mind helping out with maintaining buildbots / other build machines.
Although I don't have a lot of experience with this sort of thing (I
usually just ran a Jenkins for my own work), I think it would be a useful
way to contribute. Let me know what I should do if you are all fine
On 03Sep2014 11:47, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
Sorry, I haven't been a very good maintainer for that buildbot (the main
reason it never graduated to the stable list). If you send me your public
SSH key, I can add it (I think - if not, I can ask Luke to
38 matches
Mail list logo
