pt., 8 paź 2021 o 04:48 S Pradeep Kumar napisał(a):
> ...
> Note that we considered and rejected using a full def-signature syntax like
>
> (record: PurchaseRecord, permissions: List[AuthPermission], /) ->
> FormattedItem
>
> because it would be more verbose for common cases and could
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 1:51 PM Sam Gross wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on changes to CPython to allow it to run without the global
> interpreter lock. I'd like to share a working proof-of-concept that can run
> without the GIL. The proof-of-concept involves substantial changes to CPython
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 1:45 PM S Pradeep Kumar wrote:
> The Callable type is also usable as an expression, like in type aliases
> `IntOperator = (int, int) -> int` and `cast((int) -> int, f)` calls.
>
> **Question 1**: Are there concerns we should keep in mind about such a syntax
> proposal?
>
Hi,
I've been working on changes to CPython to allow it to run without the
global interpreter lock. I'd like to share a working proof-of-concept that
can run without the GIL. The proof-of-concept involves substantial changes
to CPython internals, but relatively few changes to the C-API. It is
Hello all,
Typing-sig has been discussing user-friendly syntax for the type used to
represent callables. [1] Since this affects the Python language syntax, we
wanted to get some high-level feedback from you before putting up a
detailed PEP.
TL;DR: We want to propose syntax for Callable types,
Now that we are on a release spree, here you have the first alpha release of
Python 3.11: Python 3.11.0a1. Let the testing and validation games begin!
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-3110a1/
*Major new features of the 3.11 series, compared with 3.10*
Python 3.11 is still in
