On Mon Feb 23 2015 at 10:55:23 AM Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
I think that's a bit too strong. This has been unquestionably valid,
correct
Python -- it was an intentional feature from the start. It may not
On Sat Feb 21 2015 at 4:23:16 PM Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com wrote:
When merging some changes while working on scandir, I noticed a minor
issue with this commit:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4f6f4aa0d80f
The definition of struct win32_stat has been moved to fileutils.h and
renamed to
On Sat Feb 21 2015 at 12:15:25 PM Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:05:11 +
Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 5:52:07 PM Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Different patterns for TypeError messages are used
On Sat Feb 21 2015 at 1:50:32 PM Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Currently for some files converted to use Argument Clinic the generated
code is written into a separate file, for other files it is inlined.
I'm going to make a number of small enhancement to Argument Clinic to
On Thu Feb 19 2015 at 5:52:07 PM Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Different patterns for TypeError messages are used in the stdlib:
expected X, Y found
expected X, found Y
expected X, but Y found
expected X instance, Y found
X expected, not Y
provided to make it easy
to get the same result as constructing the exception with the keyword-only
argument.
-Brett
-Stefan
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 20. Februar 2015 um 15:05 Uhr
*Von:* Brett Cannon br...@python.org
*An:* Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com, python-dev@python.org
*Betreff:* Re
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 11:39:11 AM Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com
wrote:
While working on a bug in the issue tracker, I came across something that
I thought was a little odd around the behaviour of IntEnum. Should the
behaviour of an instance of an IntEnum not be symmetric to an int where
I just realized I actually never committed this change. Assuming no new
objections I'll commit this in the near future (promise this time =).
On Fri May 16 2014 at 1:51:00 PM Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is some proposed wording. Since it is more of a clarification of what
You might want to try asking on python-l...@python.org to get a wider
audience as you might find a fellow AIX user there who can help you out.
On Wed Feb 11 2015 at 12:29:56 AM Dwight dcrs6...@aceweb.com wrote:
Hi,
I am primarily a user; but since I can not get a newer version
of firefox
:47 +
Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
The PEPs under consideration are PEPs 474
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0474/ and 462
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/ from Nick Coghlan to use
Kallithea and do self-hosting, and PEP 481
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0481
The PEPs under consideration are PEPs 474
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0474/ and 462
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/ from Nick Coghlan to use
Kallithea and do self-hosting, and PEP 481
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0481/ from Donald Stufft that
proposes using GitHub.
At
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 9:52:29 AM Pierre-Yves David
pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
On 02/02/2015 01:11 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 2 Feb 2015 04:56, francis franci...@email.de
mailto:franci...@email.de wrote:
[SNIP]
PS: Should this be forwarded to python-workflow or is that
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 10:00:30 AM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
The PEPs under consideration are PEPs 474
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0474/ and 462
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/ from Nick Coghlan
You have the wrong mailing list for this sort of request. This is list is
about the development *of* Python, not *with* it. And since Python the
language is not in the business of providing libraries for such specific
needs this kind of request isn't appropriate here. You can try asking
somewhere
On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 5:45:28 PM Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org wrote:
On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 11:20:02 AM M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 19:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 01/23/2015 06:30 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
Related to my earlier question regarding building Python on
A mobile SIG is being formed, but it doesn't have a mailing list yet, else
that would be a good place to ask this question.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:54:39 PM Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Maybe try a list focused on Android development? Few people in the Python
core development
This is a mailing to discuss the development *of* Python, not its *use*.
You should be able to get help from python-list or #python on IRC.
On Tue Jan 20 2015 at 9:44:48 AM Neil Girdhar mistersh...@gmail.com wrote:
I get error:
TypeError: init_builtin() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given)
On Tue Jan 20 2015 at 9:53:52 AM Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 09:51, Brett Cannon wrote:
This is a mailing to discuss the development *of* Python, not its *use*.
You should be able to get help from python-list or #python on IRC.
To be fair, he's
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 4:58:20 PM Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2015-01-14 1:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
But as Guido pointed out, we _like_ it being difficult to do because we
don't want this kind of substitution happening as code ends up depending
on
bugs and quirks
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 4:08:52 PM Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2015-01-14 12:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'm not sure how commit privileges would help you -- can't you just fork
the CPython (I'm sure there's already a Bitbucket mirror that you can
fork
easily) and do
Mark, your tone is no longer constructive and is hurting your case in
arguing for anything. Please take it down a notch.
On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 1:48:59 PM Mark Roberts wiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
Iterating accross a
.
-Brett
-Mark
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Mark, your tone is no longer constructive and is hurting your case in
arguing for anything. Please take it down a notch.
On Tue Dec 16 2014 at 1:48:59 PM Mark Roberts wiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16
This mailing list is for the development OF Python, not its use. You should
be able to get help on the python-tutor or Python - list mailing lists.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014, 16:42 Matthew Braun matth...@perfumania.com wrote:
Good Morning,
I installed Python 3.4.2 on my work computer. I was
I have now addressed Nick's comments and backported to Python 2.7.
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 8:40:24 AM Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I'll update the doc probably on Friday.
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 12:41:54 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December
to make a final decision by May 1 so that we can try to have the
changes ready for Python 3.6 development (currently scheduled for Sep 2015).
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 3:04:48 PM Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a bit long as I espoused as if this was a blog post to try and
give
Just adapt your current PEP.
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 10:02:23 AM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 11, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
As I didn't hear any objections, I'm officially stating that I expect
initial draft PEPs to be in by February 1 to know who
On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 3:14:42 PM Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mark Roberts wiz...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. I know there's a huge focus on The Big Libraries (and
wholesale
migration is all but impossible without them), but the long tail of
It would be better to file a bug at bugs.python.org so it's easier to track
the problem.
On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 11:37:30 AM 卓一抗 zhuoyik...@gmail.com wrote:
hello, everybody ,i occur an ld error in my mac os x
python 3.4.2 gcc 4.8.2
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make
On Mon Dec 08 2014 at 3:27:43 PM Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
4. Contributor creates account on bugs.python.org and signs the
[contributor agreement](https://www.python.
org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/)
Is there an expiration on such forms
Thanks for the feedback. I'll update the doc probably on Friday.
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 12:41:54 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2014 at 14:40, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2014 at 10:44, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
On Fri,
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 3:24:38 PM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
words
This looks like a pretty good write up, seems to pretty fairly evaluate
the various sides and the various concerns.
Thanks! It seems like I have
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 8:31:27 PM R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:17:35 -0700, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't exactly have a ton of people
constantly going I'm
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 2:53:43 AM Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:04 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
1. Contributor clones a repository from hg.python.org
http://hg.python.org
2. Contributor makes desired changes
3. Contributor generates a patch
4. Contributor creates
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 5:17:35 PM Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com
wrote:
Very nice, Brett.
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
And we can't forget the people who help keep all of this running as well.
There are those that manage the SSH
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 10:07:50 AM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 6, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 8:31:27 PM R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:17:35 -0700, Eric Snow
ericsnowcurren
On Sat Dec 06 2014 at 10:30:54 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 December 2014 at 00:11, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 8:31:27 PM R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
That's probably the biggest issue with *anyone* contributing to tracker
This is a bit long as I espoused as if this was a blog post to try and give
background info on my thinking, etc. The TL;DR folks should start at the
Ideal Scenario section and read to the end.
P.S.: This is in Markdown and I have put it up at
It now promotes using tooling as much as possible to automate the process
of making code by Python 2/3 source-compatible:
https://docs.python.org/3.5/howto/pyporting.html
Blog post about it at
http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/commentary-on-getting-your-code-to-run-on-python-23
.
On Fri Dec 05 2014 at 4:07:46 PM Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014, at 16:04, Brett Cannon wrote:
It now promotes using tooling as much as possible to automate the process
of making code by Python 2/3 source-compatible:
https://docs.python.org/3.5/howto
So I was waiting for Nick to say what he wanted to do for the peps repo
since I view it as I get 2/3 of the choices and he gets the other third.
The way I view it, the options are:
1. Move to GitHub
2. Move to Bitbucket
3. Improve our current tooling (either through new hosting setup
AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
So I was waiting for Nick to say what he wanted to do for the peps repo
since I view it as I get 2/3 of the choices and he gets the other third.
The way I view it, the options are:
1. Move to GitHub
2. Move to Bitbucket
3. Improve our current
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 1:52:49 PM Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 18:21:39 +
Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
So if we did have a discussion at the summit and someone decided to argue
for FLOSS vs. not as a key factor then I would politely cut them off
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 1:59:20 PM Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Dec 02, 2014, at 06:21 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Well, if I'm going to be the Great Decider on this then I can say upfront
I'm taking a pragmatic view of preferring open but not mandating it,
preferring hg over git
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 2:15:09 PM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 1:59:20 PM Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Dec 02, 2014, at 06:21 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Well, if I'm going
I should say I will take a few days to think about this and then I will
start a new thread outlining what I think we should be aiming for to help
frame the whole discussion and to give proponents something to target.
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 2:20:16 PM Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Tue
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 3:14:20 PM Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Dec 02, 2014, at 07:20 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
No because only two people have said they like the experiment idea so
that's not exactly enough to say it's worth the effort. =) Plus GitHub
could be chosen in the end
review tool. Arguments about core developers vs.
contributors for CPython shouldn't affect the current discussion.
Next, two of the three repos mentioned in Donald's PEP 481 are owned by
Brett Cannon, according to the Contact column listed on hg.python.org. I
propose to let Brett choose whether
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, 21:55 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
All the use cases seem to be about adding some kind of getattr hook to
modules. They all seem to involve modifying the CPython C code anyway. So
why not tackle that problem head-on and modify module_getattro() to look
for a
On Sat Nov 29 2014 at 7:16:34 PM Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io writes:
[words words words]
I strongly support this PEP. I'd like to share two pieces of information.
Both
of these are personal anecdotes:
For the past several years, I've
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 10:55:26 AM Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:23:08 +1100
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, GitHub is proprietary. But all of your actual code
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 12:00:20 PM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 10:55:26 AM Ian Cordasco graffatcolmin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 2:16:18 PM Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, 21:55 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
All the use cases seem to be about adding some kind of getattr hook
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 2:28:31 PM Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 11/30/2014 11:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, 21:55 Guido van Rossum wrote:
All the use cases seem to be about adding some kind of getattr
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 2:33:35 PM Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 30, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
All very true, but if we can't improve both sides then we are simply going
to end up with even more patches that we take a while to get around to. I
want
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 3:55:39 PM Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
All the use cases seem to be about adding some kind of getattr hook to
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 1:17:49 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 13:18, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
There’s also the social aspects of it as well which is a big concern too
IMO. If you want to attract new contributors, not just keep the ones you
On Mon Nov 24 2014 at 2:25:30 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2014 at 02:55, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 6:18:46 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Those features are readily accessible without changing the underlying
version
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 6:18:46 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 Nov 2014 18:11, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:35 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
In the absence of a proposal to change version control systems
(again), the lack
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 1:06:18 PM Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 11/23/2014 08:55 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Sure, but I would never compare our infrastructure needs to Red Hat. =)
You
also have to be conservative in order to minimize downtown and impact for
cost reasons
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 1:08:58 PM Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 11/23/2014 08:55 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Fourth, do any core developers feel strongly about not using GitHub?
Dous GitHub support hg? If not, I am strongly opposed.
Depends on what you mean by support. If you
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 11:56:49 AM Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
More generally, I'm very, very disappointed to see folks so willing to
abandon fellow community members for the sake of following the crowd.
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 1:31:36 PM Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 11:56:49 AM Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
More generally, I'm very, very disappointed to see folks so willing
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 3:04:05 PM Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 11/23/2014 05:55 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I guess my question is who and what is going to be disrupted if we go
with
Guido's suggestion of switching to GitHub for code hosting? Contributors
won't
be disrupted at all
On Sun Nov 23 2014 at 4:18:37 PM Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 11/23/2014 09:42 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
[SNIP]
And I'm still in support no matter what of breaking out the HOWTOs
and the
tutorial into their own repos for easier updating (having to
update the Python
On Sat Nov 22 2014 at 10:00:03 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 Nov 2014 07:37, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 21, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
Sure, I get that. But we're not even talking here about the main
Python
docs since they are
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 7:37:13 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
For those that aren't aware, PEP 474 is a PEP I wrote a while back
suggesting we set up a forge.python.org service that provides easier
management of Mercurial repos that don't have the complex branching
requirements of
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 8:57:15 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2014 23:29, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 7:37:13 AM Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
If that must be self-hosted constraint is removed, then the obvious
candidate
On Mon Nov 17 2014 at 12:06:15 PM Stefan Bucur stefan.bu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mark, thank you for the pointer! I will re-send my message there. Should I
include both mailing lists in a single thread if I end up receiving replies
from both?
No as cross-posting becomes just a nightmare of
What is pythontest.net? Is it something we control, and if so how do we add
things to it for tests? Did I miss an email on python-dev or
python-committers about this?
On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 8:57:22 AM georg.brandl python-check...@python.org
wrote:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0af36ea1d010
Ah, cool! Just an FYI, the index.html file is not being served for me.
-Brett
On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 9:41:59 AM Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014, at 09:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
What is pythontest.net? Is it something we control, and if so how do we
add
On Mon Nov 03 2014 at 5:31:21 AM Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Just to be clear, this is about NotImplemented, not NotImplementedError.
tl;dr When a binary operation fails, should an exception be raised or
NotImplemented returned?
The docs for NotImplemented suggest it's only for
Python-dev is for discussing the development *of* Python, not *with* it.
This kind of thing is more appropriate for python-list.
On Tue Oct 07 2014 at 11:49:37 AM tshawver tshaw...@quantopian.com wrote:
As part of the work on our research environment at Quantopian
On Tue Oct 07 2014 at 2:24:52 PM Skip Montanaro skip.montan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:46 PM, John Smith sanspriv...@gmail.com wrote:
pyc-only install sees mediocre performance. (pyc's are built using
compileall.py, then source .py's removed before packaging)
(Warning:
Open an issue on bugs.python.org and attach the patch there (it should also
ask you so sign the contributor agreement, but if not then please also sign
that).
On Fri Sep 05 2014 at 12:52:45 PM Jonas Wagner jonas.wag...@epfl.ch wrote:
Hi again,
the attached Makefile patch seems to fix the
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014, 15:16 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My bashrc sets MAKEFLAGS to -j9 and Python compilation works fine on Fedora
20 with GNU make and GCC. My computer has 8 cores (4 physical with hyper
threading).
It looks like your compiler is Clang. What is your OS
On Wed Aug 20 2014 at 9:02:25 AM Antoine Pitrou anto...@python.org wrote:
Le 20/08/2014 07:08, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
It's not just the JVM that says text and binary APIs should be separate
- it's every widely used operating system services layer except POSIX.
The POSIX way works well
test_codecs is not happy. Looking at the subject lines of commit emails
from the past day I don't see any obvious cause.
On Thu Aug 07 2014 at 4:35:05 AM solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
results for 09f56fdcacf1 on branch default
test_codecs leaked
On Tue Jul 29 2014 at 4:52:14 PM agrim khanna khannaag...@gmail.com wrote:
Respected Sir/Madam,
I have installed the setup on my machine and have compiled and run it as
well. I was unable to figure out how to make a patch and how to find a
suitable bug for me to fix. I request you to guide
On Thu Jul 24 2014 at 1:07:12 PM, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com
wrote:
I have an importer for use in applications that embed an interpreter
that does a similar job to the Zip importer (except that the storage is
a C data structure rather than a .zip file). Just like the Zip
On Thu Jul 24 2014 at 2:12:20 PM, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com
wrote:
On 24/07/2014 6:48 pm, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Thu Jul 24 2014 at 1:07:12 PM, Phil Thompson
p...@riverbankcomputing.com
wrote:
I have an importer for use in applications that embed an interpreter
Oh yes. :) The file Antoine is referring to is the implementation of import.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014, 17:34 Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried modifying importlib's _bootstrap.py to use scandir()
instead
of listdir() + stat()?
No, I haven't -- I'm not familiar with that code.
On Mon Jul 14 2014 at 11:27:34 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
wrote:
Am 12.07.14 17:19, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
Using the stable ABI for standard library extensions also serves to
decouple them further from the internal details of the CPython runtime,
making it more likely they will
On Mon Jul 14 2014 at 12:17:03 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
has now been dead for five months.
This is the wrong place to ask about this. It falls under the purview of
the web site who you can email at webmaster@ or submit an issue at
https://github.com/python/pythondotorg . But
[for those that don't know, 3121 is extension module inti/finalization and
384 is the stable ABI]
On Thu Jul 10 2014 at 3:47:03 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I'm just curious as to why there are 54 open issues after both of these
PEPs have been accepted and 384 is listed as
On Sat Jun 07 2014 at 5:55:29 PM, Le Pa lpan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in learning how the cpython interpreter is designed and
implemented,
and also how the python debugger works internally. My ultimate purpose is
to
modify
them for my distributed computing needs. Are there
On Mon Jun 09 2014 at 2:07:22 AM, Steven Stewart-Gallus
sstewartgallu...@mylangara.bc.ca wrote:
Hello,
I would like some help understanding the build system. I am currently
working on an issue (http://bugs.python.org/issue21627) and plan to
create some common functionality in
On Mon Jun 09 2014 at 1:48:27 PM, Steven Stewart-Gallus
sstewartgallu...@mylangara.bc.ca wrote:
Do you mean other than potentially detecting something in the
configurescript and using an #ifdef guard?
Yes, that works on a static function inside a file level but I need to
conditionally
On Sat Jun 07 2014 at 9:11:54 AM, Claudiu Popa pcmantic...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
After Glyph and Alex's email about their asks for assisting in writing
Python 2/3 code, it got me thinking about where in the toolchain various
After Glyph and Alex's email about their asks for assisting in writing
Python 2/3 code, it got me thinking about where in the toolchain various
warnings and such should go in order to help direct energy to help develop
whatever future toolchain to assist in porting.
There seems to be three places
On Fri Jun 06 2014 at 2:29:13 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/6/2014 12:37 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
After Glyph and Alex's email about their asks for assisting in writing
Python 2/3 code, it got me thinking about where in the toolchain various
warnings and such should go
On Fri Jun 06 2014 at 2:59:24 PM, dw+python-...@hmmz.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:49:24PM +0400, Brian Curtin wrote:
None of the options are particularly good, but yes, I think that's an
option we have to consider. We're supporting 2.7.x for 6 more years on
a compiler that is
Patches sent to python-dev are typically ignored. Could you open an issue
on bugs.python.org and upload it there?
On Mon Jun 02 2014 at 2:20:43 PM, Michael Haubenwallner
michael.haubenwall...@ssi-schaefer.com wrote:
Hi,
following up myself with a patch proposal:
On 05/28/2014 04:51 PM,
:Brett Cannon br...@python.org
date:Fri May 30 14:55:29 2014 -0400
summary:
Issue #20383: Introduce importlib.util.module_from_spec().
diff --git a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py
--- a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py
+++ b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py
I think the memory leak was caused by
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7d20e30bd540 because
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/0eedac3d0b0a/Python/import.c#l903 sets
the 'res' variable and then overwrites it unconditionally w/o PY_DECREF
beforehand.
On Thu May 29 2014 at 4:02:17 AM,
On Wed May 28 2014 at 10:14:39 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz gl...@twistedmatrix.com
wrote:
At the language summit, Alex and I volunteered to put together some
recommendations on what changes could be made to Python (the language) in
order to facilitate a smoother transition from Python 2 to Python 3.
Brett Cannon
and I are both in a position to build 2.7 right now, and I hope to simplify
the setup required for 3.5 so that anyone can produce and test the
installers. (Martin is going to look after the 3.4.x builds.)
Obviously I'm also here to help out with Windows in general. I haven't
quite
,
+Brett Cannon br...@python.org
Status: Active
Type: Process
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 07-Jul-2002
Post-History: 18-Aug-2007
+ 16-May-2014
Abstract
-This PEP documents operating systems (platforms) which are not
-supported in Python anymore
On Thu May 15 2014 at 10:24:45 AM, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
We already have such buildbots, they are in the unstable category.
You can browse through existing buildbots here:
Over the past week or so there have been 2 patches to add support for
various UNIX OSs. Now I thought we had stopped trying to add new esoteric
OSs (e.g. I had never heard of MirOS until the patch for it came in), but I
can't find a PEP that spells out what it takes to get a platform supported (
On Wed May 14 2014 at 10:43:18 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 14:20:26 +
Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Over the past week or so there have been 2 patches to add support for
various UNIX OSs. Now I thought we had stopped trying to add new
1101 - 1200 of 3172 matches
Mail list logo
