This seems the best thread to follow up on, just had a spurious failure
backporting a patch to 3.8 from master:
https://dev.azure.com/Python/cpython/_build/results?buildId=57386=logs=c83831cd-3752-5cc7-2f01-8276919eb334=5a421c4a-0933-53d5-26b9-04b36ad165eb
On 01/05/2019 17:09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Executive summary:
"There should be a tool" (sorry, I'm not volunteering any time soon)
that could be added to $VCS diff (say, "git coverage-diff" or "git
diff --coverage").
That sounds like a very hard problem to solve...
> If people are
On 01/05/2019 14:52, Karthikeyan wrote:
We try to support several different ways of running tests. This allows
to catch some environment depended flaws in tests and serves as a kind
of the test of unittest itself. Not all test files are made
discoverable
yet, but we move in
On 01/05/2019 14:22, Paul Moore wrote:
If people are actually using these blocks, then so be it, but it feels
like the people who want them to stick around are saying they're using
them just on the off chance they might use them, which feels like a poor
reason to keep a bunch of dead code
Sorry, accidentally include a comment for this in a reply to Paul:
On 01/05/2019 13:39, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
We try to support several different ways of running tests. This allows
to catch some environment depended flaws in tests and serves as a kind
of the test of unittest itself. Not all
On 01/05/2019 13:37, Paul Moore wrote:
I agree - removing this just to make the coverage figures look pretty
seems like the wrong motivation.
Configuring coverage to understand that you want to exclude these
lines from the checking would be fine, as would accepting that a
coverage of slightly
On 01/05/2019 13:21, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mer. 1 mai 2019 à 03:12, Chris Withers a écrit :
Right, but that's not the documented way of running individual suites in
the devguide.
Maybe, but I'm using that sometimes and it's useful for some specific
issues. Is it possible to run
On 01/05/2019 07:46, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
01.05.19 00:24, Chris Withers пише:
I have a crazy idea of getting unittest.mock up to 100% code coverage.
I noticed at the bottom of all of the test files in testmock/, there's a:
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
...block.
How
On 01/05/2019 06:12, Terry Reedy wrote:
Such blocks should be excluded from coverage by the default .coveragerc
file. Mine came with
exclude_lines =
# Don't complain if non-runnable code isn't run:
if 0:
if __name__ == .__main__.:
if DEBUG:
Which .coveragerc are you
Hi All,
I have a crazy idea of getting unittest.mock up to 100% code coverage.
I noticed at the bottom of all of the test files in testmock/, there's a:
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
...block.
How would people feel about these going away? I don't *think* they're
needed now
[resending to python-dev in case there are Jython users here...]
Hi All,
If you need Jython support in the mock backport, please shout now:
https://github.com/testing-cabal/mock/issues/453
cheers,
Chris
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On 28/04/2019 22:21, Robert Collins wrote:
Thank you!
Thank me when we get there ;-) Currently in Dec 2018 with a wonderful
Py2 failure:
==
ERROR: test_autospec_getattr_partial_function
On 28/04/2019 03:51, Martin Panter wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 19:07, Chris Withers wrote:
Right, so I've merged up to 15f44ab043, what comes next?
$ git log --oneline --no-merges 15f44ab043.. -- Lib/unittest/mock.py
Lib/unittest/test/testmock/ | tail -n 3
This Git command line means
On 28/04/2019 03:51, Martin Panter wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 19:07, Chris Withers wrote:
Right, so I've merged up to 15f44ab043, what comes next?
$ git log --oneline --no-merges 15f44ab043.. -- Lib/unittest/mock.py
Lib/unittest/test/testmock/ | tail -n 3
This Git command line means list
Hi All,
I'm in the process of bringing the mock backport up to date, but this
has got me stumped:
$ git log --oneline --no-merges
5943ea76d529f9ea18c73a61e10c6f53bdcc864f.. -- Lib/unittest/mock.py
Lib/unittest/test/testmock/ | tail
362f058a89 Issue #28735: Fixed the comparison of
Hello,
I'd like to see if I can help with unittest.mock, but don't have a huge
amount of bandwidth and can't even parse let alone process the whole
firehose of bpo and GH PRs.
Is there any way I can get bugs.python.org and github PRs to only tell
me about things, preferably by email, that
1177: Skip deleted attributes while calling reset_mock (GH-9302)
Victor
Le dim. 2 déc. 2018 à 15:45, Chris Withers a écrit :
Hi All,
It's been quite a long time since I last used my python commit rights,
and it appears they've evaporated in the move to GitHub.
I'd like to get back into h
Hi All,
It's been quite a long time since I last used my python commit rights,
and it appears they've evaporated in the move to GitHub.
I'd like to get back into helping out, particularly with unittest.mock
where I've recently started helping out as a maintainer over on
Hi All,
It's been quite a long time since I last used my python commit rights,
and it appears they've evaporated in the move to GitHub.
I'd like to get back into helping out, particularly with unittest.mock
where I've recently started helping out as a maintainer over on
Hi All,
I hit this every time I install packages on Mac OS X that use libssl, it
looks like extensions are built linking to .dylib's that are not
resolveable when the library is actually used:
>>> from OpenSSL import SSL
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File
Hi All,
I hit this every time I install packages on Mac OS X that use libssl, it
looks like extensions are built linking to .dylib's that are not
resolveable when the library is actually used:
from OpenSSL import SSL
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File
On 24/12/2015 14:36, Cory Benfield wrote:
On 24 Dec 2015, at 11:17, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
Here's a couple of examples of this problem in the wild:
https://github.com/alekstorm/backports.ssl/issues/9
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32978365/how-do-i-run-ps
On 14/10/2015 16:04, Stefan Ring wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
I'm having trouble with some python processes that are using 3GB+ of memory
but when I inspect them with either heapy or meliae, injected via pyrasite,
those tools only
Hi All,
I'm having trouble with some python processes that are using 3GB+ of
memory but when I inspect them with either heapy or meliae, injected via
pyrasite, those tools only report total memory usage to be 119Mb.
This feels like the old "python high water mark" problem, but I thought
On 14/10/2015 16:13, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
You may also try tracemalloc to get stats of the Python memory usage ;-)
The Python memory allocator was optimized in Python 3.3: it now uses
mmap() when available (on UNIX), it helps to reduce the fragmentation
of the heap memory. Since Python
On 16/07/2015 16:27, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 16 July 2015 at 20:35, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
In which version? I don't see that phrase in the 3.5 docs.
The equivalent note in 3.x is Do not use stdout=PIPE or stderr=PIPE
with this function. The child process will block if it
On 20/04/2015 20:09, Paul Moore wrote:
On 20 April 2015 at 19:41, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for stub
files be better?
I think so. I think PEP 8 should require stub files for stdlib modules and
strongly encourage them
On 20/04/2015 19:30, Harry Percival wrote:
Hi all,
tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for
stub files be better?
I was trying to find Jack's original post as I think his summary is
excellent and aligns well with where I think I'm coming from on this:
On 20/04/2015 19:30, Harry Percival wrote:
Hi all,
tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for
stub files be better?
I think Jack's summary of this is excellent and aligns well with where I
think I'm coming from on this:
On 20/04/2015 20:09, Paul Moore wrote:
On 20 April 2015 at 19:41, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for stub
files be better?
I think so. I think PEP 8 should require stub files for stdlib modules and
strongly encourage them
On 21/04/2015 12:23, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
Well,
(i) can be done with good documentation (docstrings etc.).
Documentation is not checked. It often loses sync with the actual
code. Docs say one thing, code does another.
That certainly something that could be fixed by formalising
On 28/01/2015 07:14, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
It is a potentially bad idea if order is the default behavior of
iteration, items(), keys() and values(). Ideally order should only be
exposed when explicitly asked for to help prevent bugs and mitigate
potential information leaks.
I have to be
On 24/11/2014 02:59, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 08:55 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
- Moving from Hg to Git is a fair amount of one-time work
For anyone seriously interested in this, even experimentally, I would highly
suggest looking at Eric Raymond's reposurgeon code. You can
Hi All,
I've been trying to add support for explicit comparison of namedtuples
into testfixtures and hit a problem which lead me to read the source and
be sad.
Rather than the mixin and class assembly in the function I expected to
find, I'm greeted by an exec of a string.
Curious as to
On 25/04/2014 03:00, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
2) If you're starting a new project, follow PEP8 (or the standards for
the language you're using) to preserve CONSISTENCY.
Don't forget that PEP 8 is not the standard for the
On 25/04/2014 04:03, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Don't forget that PEP 8 is not the standard for the Python language,
only the Python stdlib. Particularly, there's no strong reason to
follow some of its lesser advices (eg spaces rather than tabs, the
Hi All,
Apologies if this is considered off topic, but I'm keen to get the
language designers point of view and short of emailing Barry, Guido
and Nick directly, this seemed like the best place.
I'm having a tough time persuading some people of the benefits of pep8,
particularly when it
Hi All,
Apologies if this is considered off topic, but I'm keen to get the
language designers point of view and short of emailing Barry, Guido
and Nick directly, this seemed like the best place.
I'm having a tough time persuading some people of the benefits of pep8,
particularly when it
On 03/12/2014 04:49 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
You can use hasattr() in place of AttributeError
Is that true now? It used to be that hasattr swallowed all exceptions
rather than just AttributeError making is a very dangerous weapon for
anything (such as an orm or odb) that might do something
Hi All,
Sending this to python-dev as I'm wondering if this was considered when
the choice to have objects of different types raise a TypeError when
ordered...
So, the concrete I case I have is implementing stable ordering for the
python Range objects that psycopg2 uses. These have 3
On 06/09/2013 07:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
This happens very infrequently, the OS is Windows 7 and the filesystem
is NTFS, if that helps...
It should help indeed:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2012/09/07/10347136.aspx
The box in questions runs no AV software or indexing
On 06/09/2013 08:14, Nick Coghlan wrote:
This feels a lot like an issue we were seeing on the Windows
buildbots, which we ended up working around in the test support
library: http://bugs.python.org/issue15496
Wow :'(
That would be some awfully ugly code to upgrade from hack in the test
Hi All,
Continuous testing is a wonderful thing when it comes to finding weird
edge case problems, like this one:
On 25/07/2013 16:30, Brett Cannon wrote:
Based on the list of people who are members of github.com/python
http://github.com/python it's as official as it's going to get
(depends on who of that group owns it).
But assuming whomever owns it is okay with hosting a mirror, what
exactly is going to
On 05/07/2013 11:26, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
...
A.__getattribute__(A,'s')
staticmethod object at 0x100937828
A.__getattribute__(A,'c')
classmethod object at 0x100937860
A.__getattribute__(A,'r')
function A.r at 0x100938378
Okay, but with this line:
found = found.__getattribute__(found,
Hi All,
In Python 2, I can figure out whether I have a method or a function,
and, more importantly, for an unbound method, I can figure out what
class the method belongs to:
class MyClass(object):
... def method(self): pass
...
MyClass.method
unbound method MyClass.method
On 04/07/2013 12:59, Christian Heimes wrote:
Am 04.07.2013 13:21, schrieb Chris Withers:
There doesn't appear to be any way in Python 3 to do this, which is a
little surprising and frustrating...
What am I missing here?
I removed unbound methods almost six years ago:
http://hg.python.org
.meth())
cheers,
Chris
On 04/07/2013 17:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Chris, what do you want to do with the knowledge you are seeking?
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone)
On Jul 4, 2013 4:28 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
mailto:ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All
don't know that Victor's suggestion will actually work in all the
cases that MyClass.a_method.im_class does :-S
Chris
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
Hi Guido,
I've bumped into this a couple of times.
First time was when I wanted to know whether
On 04/07/2013 20:50, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2013/7/4 Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com:
You could always monkeypatch builtins.__build_class__ to add an attribute to
every unbound method pointing to the class.
I would not reccomend that. __build_class__ is very internal and it's
On 03/02/2013 13:27, Tres Seaver wrote:
As for setuptools (as opposed to distribute), I don't think we should
care anymore.
Yes, you need to care. It is *still* true today that distribute and
setuptools remain largely interchangeable, which is the only thing that
makes distribute viable, in
Hi All,
I've run into some issues installing lxml for python 3.3 on my mac:
One of the stumbling blocks I've hit is that I built python 3.3 from
source (./configure make make altinstall), and it used clang:
buzzkill:virtualenvs chris$ /src/Python-3.3.0/python.exe
Python 3.3.0 (default,
On 14/02/2013 09:18, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I've run into some issues installing lxml for python 3.3 on my mac:
(forgot the links)
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/lxml/2013-February/006730.html
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/lxml/2013-February/006731.html
On 14/02/2013 12:15, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
buzzkill:virtualenvs chris$ /src/Python-3.3.0/python.exe
Python 3.3.0 (default, Jan 23 2013, 09:56:03)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang 3.0 (tags/Apple/clang-211.12)] on darwin
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
On 12/02/2013 21:03, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
We recently encountered a performance issue in stdlib for pypy. It
turned out that someone commited a performance fix that uses += for
strings instead of .join() that was there before.
That's... interesting.
I fixed a performance bug in httplib
On 13/02/2013 11:53, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I fixed a performance bug in httplib some years ago by doing the exact
opposite; += - ''.join(). In that case, it changed downloading a file
from 20 minutes to 3 seconds. That was likely on Python 2.5.
I remember it well.
Hi all,
So, dicts in Python 3 return something different from their keys and
values methods:
dict(x=1, y=2).keys()
dict_keys(['y', 'x'])
type(dict(x=1, y=2).keys())
class 'dict_keys'
I have vague memories of these things being referred to as views or some
such? Where can I learn more?
Hi All,
I see in Python 3, some ImportErrors have grown a '_not_found'
attribute. What's the significance of this attribute and where/how is it
added?
The only way I can seem to create this attribute is:
ex = ImportError
ex._not_found = True
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content
On 11/02/2013 10:54, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
I see in Python 3, some ImportErrors have grown a '_not_found' attribute.
What's the significance of this attribute and where/how is it added?
The only way I can seem
Hi All,
I'm finally getting around to porting some of the packages I maintain
over to Python 3.
One rough edge I've hit: I see the atexit module has moved to be C-based
and, as far as I can tell, no longer allows you to introspect what
atexit functions have been registered.
If I'm writing
Hi All,
Where would I look to find out which release a fix for an issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue15822 if you're interested ;-)) will land in?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
On 08/02/2013 11:17, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:58:36 +,
Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk a écrit :
Hi All,
Where would I look to find out which release a fix for an issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue15822 if you're interested ;-)) will
land in?
Just read that
Hi All,
Just had a bit of an embarrassing incident in some code where I did:
sometotal =+ somevalue
I'm curious why this syntax is allowed? I'm sure there are good reasons,
but thought I'd ask...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
-
On 08/02/2013 16:17, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
Decimal.__pos__ uses it to return a Decimal instance that has the
default precision of the current Decimal context:
from decimal import Decimal
d = Decimal('0.33')
d
On 05/12/2012 17:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Check if child process has terminated. Returns None while the child is
still running,
any non-None value means that the child has terminated. In either case,
the return
value is also available from the instance's returncode attribute.
Do you want
Hi All,
Would anyone object to me making a change to the docs for 2.6, 2.7 and
3.x to clarify the following:
http://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen.poll
A couple of my colleagues have ended up writing code like this:
proc = Popen(['some', 'thing'])
code =
On 05/12/2012 16:34, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
http://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen.poll
The doc looks clear to me. poll() returns the returncode attribute which
is described thusly:
A None value indicates that the process hasn’t terminated yet.
Therefore, I don't
Hi All,
A colleague pointed me at Doug's excellent article here:
http://www.doughellmann.com/articles/misc/dict-performance/index.html
...which made me a little sad, I suspect I'm not the only one who finds:
a_dict = dict(
x = 1,
y = 2,
z = 3,
...
)
...easier to read
On 14/11/2012 09:58, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
On 14 November 2012 10:12, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...which made me a little sad
Why did it make you sad? dict() takes 0.2µs, {} takes 0.04µs. In other
words: you can run dict() _five million_ times per second, and {}
twenty
On 14/11/2012 10:11, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Zitat von Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
a_dict = dict(
x = 1,
y = 2,
z = 3,
...
)
What can we do to speed up the former case?
It should be possible to special-case it. Rather than creating
a new dictionary from
On 14/11/2012 21:40, Greg Ewing wrote:
* If the compiler were allowed to recognise builtins, it could
turn dict(a = 1, b = 2) into {'a':1, 'b':2} automatically.
That would be my naive suggestion, I am prepared to be shot down in
flames ;-)
Would be even more awesome if it could end up with
On 14/11/2012 22:37, Chris Withers wrote:
On 14/11/2012 10:11, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
def xdict(**kwds):
return kwds
Hah, good call, this trumps both of the other options:
$ python2.7 -m timeit -n 100 -r 5 -v
{'a':1,'b':2,'c':3,'d':4,'e':5,'f':6,'g':7}
raw times: 1.45 1.45 1.44
On 15/11/2012 06:32, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Donald Stufft, 15.11.2012 00:00:
$ pypy -m timeit 'dict()'
10 loops, best of 3: 0.000811 usec per loop
$ pypy -m timeit '{}'
10 loops, best of 3: 0.000809 usec per loop
$ pypy -m timeit 'def md(**kw): return kw; md()'
1 loops,
Hi All,
I wanted to run the unit tests before checking in the patch for
http://bugs.python.org/issue16441, even though it's a trivial change, so
I was trying to follow the instructions at:
http://docs.python.org/devguide/
I'm on MacOS, so following the unix instructions did:
./configure
On 09/11/2012 10:52, Michael Foord wrote:
However, I can't find the python it's built...
It should be python.exe (yes really).
Hah! Should http://docs.python.org/devguide/ be updated to reflect this
or does this only affect Mac OS? (or should we correct the build so it
doesn't spit out a
On 09/11/2012 11:54, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 9 Nov, 2012, at 11:57, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
On 09/11/2012 10:52, Michael Foord wrote:
However, I can't find the python it's built...
It should be python.exe (yes really).
Hah! Should http://docs.python.org/devguide/
On 09/11/2012 11:54, Hans Mulder wrote:
I tried make test, and I got:
test test_urllib failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File /Users/hans/python/cpython/cpython-2.7/Lib/test/test_urllib.py,
line 235, in test_missing_localfile
fp.close()
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'fp'
Hi All,
I bumped into this using Michael Foord's Mock library.
It feels like a bug to me, but thought I'd ask here before logging one
in the tracker in case people know that we won't be able to fix it:
On 05/11/2012 13:43, Michael Foord wrote:
class Foo(object):
... def __setattr__(s, k,
Hi All,
This feels like a bug, but just wanted to check here before filing a
report if I've missed something:
buzzkill$ python2.7
Enthought Python Distribution -- www.enthought.com
Version: 7.2-2 (32-bit)
Python 2.7.2 |EPD 7.2-2 (32-bit)| (default, Sep 7 2011, 09:16:50)
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple
Hi All,
Sorry if this is considered slightly off topic, but Sphinx is the tool
we use for the Python core docs so:
Who's looking after Sphinx nowadays? I've hit what I consider to be a bug:
https://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev/browse_thread/thread/197fc26ba570913d?hl=en
So I forked on
Hi Georg,
On 26/07/2012 21:07, Georg Brandl wrote:
If you're patient enough, I'll take care of your problem eventually.
If not, and you're looking for a project to co-maintain, we can set
something up :)
I'm certainly interested in helping out where I can, Sphinx has been a
fantastic
On 21/03/2012 09:33, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
On 21/03/2012 08:25, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:00, Georg Brandlg.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
OK, that seems to be the main point people make... let me see if I can
come up with a better compromise.
Would it be possible to limit
On 10/02/2012 09:44, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
you can download the PyPy 1.8 release here:
http://pypy.org/download.html
Why no Windows 64-bit build :'(
Is the 32-bit build safe to use on 64-bit Windows?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
On 27/01/2012 15:09, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:21:33 +0200
Eli Benderskyeli...@gmail.com wrote:
Following an earlier discussion on python-ideas [1], we would like to
propose the following PEP for review. Discussion is welcome. The PEP
can also be viewed in HTML form at
On 01/02/2012 17:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Another question: a common pattern is to use (immutable) class
variables as default values for instance variables, and only set the
instance variables once they need to be different. Does such a class
benefit from your improvement?
A less common
On 14/01/2012 16:14, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hello,
just a heads-up: documentation for 2.7 branch has been ported to use
sphinx 1.0, so now the same syntax can be used for 2.x and 3.x
patches, hopefully easying working on both python stacks.
That's great news, does that now mean the objects
Finally, a reason to use Python 3 ;-)
Chris
On 13/01/2012 16:00, Guido van Rossum wrote:
AWESOME!!!
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I marked PEP 380 as Final this evening, after pushing the tested and
documented
What's the python-dev view on this?
Original Message
Subject: Anyone still using Python 2.5?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:15:46 +
From: Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
To: Python List python-l...@python.org,
testing-in-pyt...@lists.idyll.org testing-in-pyt
On 24/09/2011 00:32, Guido van Rossum wrote:
The interactive console is optimized for people entering code by
typing, not by copying and pasting large gobs of text.
If you think you can have it both, show us the code.
Anatoly wants ipython's new qtconsole.
This does the right thing because
On 15/09/2011 19:31, Michael Foord wrote:
The current tools are a real pain for versioning anyway. If your pypi
page even *links* to a page that offers an alpha or beta (in development
version) for download then both pip and easy_install will fetch that, in
preference to the most recent version
Hi All,
Any chance the version of sphinx used to generate the docs on
docs.python.org could be updated?
I'd love to take advantage of the new format intersphinx mapping:
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ext/intersphinx.html#confval-intersphinx_mapping
...but since it looks like docs.python.org uses
On 16/08/2011 16:05, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hello Chris,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 00:58, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Any chance the version of sphinx used to generate the docs on
docs.python.org could be updated?
I think what's needed first is to run a pilot: take the
On 19/07/2011 22:21, R. David Murray wrote:
The basic additional API is that a 'source' attribute contains the
text the generator read from the input source, and a 'value' attribute
that contains the value with all the Content-Transfer-Encoding stuff
undone so that you have a real unicode
Hi All,
A friend of mine is coming over to Python and asked a question I thought
would have a better answer than it appears to:
How do I know which version of Python a PEP lands in?
I was expecting there to be a note at the bottom of the PEP, 342 in this
case, but that doesn't appear to be
On 06/02/2011 15:20, Brian Curtin wrote:
There are still outstanding considerations in the various issues on the
tracker, so it would be best to address them before requesting
integration. Example: What should happen when there is another Python
installation on the path?
Same as happens with
On 06/02/2011 15:25, Brian Curtin wrote:
So put the new path before the old path, or replace it? The current
patch appends to the end.
I believe the last path wins in Windows land, so that would be fine.
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
On 28/01/2011 19:21, Michael Foord wrote:
I've helped quite a few python newbies on Windows who are also
surprised / frustrated on learning that python on the command line
doesn't work after installing python.
Yes, I've always found it a surprising disappointment that I have to
manually munge
On 07/12/2010 20:26, Vinay Sajip wrote:
I would suggest that when unit testing, rather than adding StreamHandlers to log
to stderr, that something like TestHandler and Matcher from this post:
http://plumberjack.blogspot.com/2010/09/unit-testing-and-logging.html
For Python 2, my testfixtures
On 05/10/2010 12:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:21:15 pm Chris Withers wrote:
On 25/09/2010 04:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
1. Return the case of a filename in some canonical form which
depends on the file system?
2. Return the case of a filename as it is actually stored
On 05/10/2010 13:00, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
3. stay with versioned project file names and rename 'python-wing.wpr'
to 'python-wing3.wpr'
(Option 3 could be done immediately of course.)
Option 3 looks the most reasonable to me.
I don't use Wing, but option 3 does seem most sensible.
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
