Re: [Python-Dev] a quit that actually quits

2005-12-28 Thread François Pinard
magic that newcomers need to sort out. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 updates/clarifications

2005-12-15 Thread François Pinard
the probability of clashes with usual natural language words; for the randomising programmers, well, because they do not deserve being protected :-). -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http

Re: [Python-Dev] Deprecate __ private (was Re: PEP 8 updates/clarifications)

2005-12-14 Thread François Pinard
the original topic. Let's drop the matter here as not being much more of general interest, or else, let's switch to private email. Keep happy, all. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev

Re: [Python-Dev] Deprecate __ private (was Re: PEP 8 updates/clarifications)

2005-12-14 Thread François Pinard
[Phillip J. Eby] At 09:53 AM 12/13/2005 -0500, François Pinard wrote: Everybody here agrees that this style makes the code much less legible. I hope you mean, here at your company or organization, as I disagree. :) Yes, of course! Sorry for the ambiguity. -- François Pinard http

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 updates/clarifications

2005-12-14 Thread François Pinard
(): with for key in dict:. - Replacing if has_key(dict, key): with if key in dict:. and there might be others. Deprecated functions could be listed, too. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 updates/clarifications

2005-12-14 Thread François Pinard
[Guido van Rossum] On 12/14/05, François Pinard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like that PEP 0008 add some cement around this idea that common English words, properly spelled, which are likely to be user variable names, be avoided whenever reasonable. I don't think that's a reasonable rule

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 updates/clarifications

2005-12-10 Thread François Pinard
[Ian Bicking] Barry Warsaw wrote: Just like I wouldn't like someone using self outside of the first argument of instance methods. A tiny nit. Within __new__(cls, ...), I find quite legible writing: self = BASECLASSE.__new__(cls, ...) and using it afterwards. -- François Pinard http

Re: [Python-Dev] No more problems with new SVN repository

2005-11-04 Thread François Pinard
, where ARG1 and ARG2 are arguments given to the pre-commit script. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http

Re: [Python-Dev] Freezing the CVS on Oct 26 for SVN switchover

2005-10-31 Thread François Pinard
you want substitutions. That property is named svn:keywords and its value decides which kind of substitution you want to allow. This is all theory for me, I never used them. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing

Re: [Python-Dev] Divorcing str and unicode (no more implicit conversions).

2005-10-31 Thread François Pinard
as possible using Python, while naming identifiers naturally. It is not so unreasonable that we keep some _hope_ that Guido will soon choose to help us all, not only me. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list

Re: [Python-Dev] Divorcing str and unicode (no more implicit conversions).

2005-10-30 Thread François Pinard
[Martin von Löwis] My canonical example is François Pinard, who keeps requesting it, saying that local people where surprised they couldn't use accented characters in Python. Perhaps that's because he actually is Quebecian :-) I presume I should comment a bit on this. People here

Re: [Python-Dev] Simplify lnotab? (AST branch update)

2005-10-14 Thread François Pinard
(referring to the `#line' directive message, a little earlier this week). For example, think include files. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Python-Dev] Simplify lnotab? (AST branch update)

2005-10-14 Thread François Pinard
[Raymond Hettinger] Even better if the lines for a particular piece of code don't have to all come from the same file. YAGNI I surely needed it, more than once. Don't be so assertive. :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

Re: [Python-Dev] and and or operators in Py3.0

2005-09-19 Thread François Pinard
. Now, could we evaluate that speed up on the average code, like on the Python library say? It might not be worth the change... -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] string formatting and i18n

2005-09-05 Thread François Pinard
strings. Yet, The file %(filename)s in directory %(dir)s is read only % vars() is already usable. The need being already filled without Template strings, it could hardly be presented as a motivation for them. :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

Re: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0

2005-09-04 Thread François Pinard
-less function calls, yet they may be week at handling functions as first-class objects. (And besides, I'm far from overly liking them! :-). -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http

Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3.0 blocks?

2005-08-28 Thread François Pinard
if this might hurt good coders once in a while. But I'm not sure! -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] empty string api for files

2005-08-28 Thread François Pinard
Problem! One-who-happily-forgot-all-bout-this-ly yours... P.S. - How is this related to Python? Luckily! -- that is: *not*! :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] Generalised String Coercion

2005-08-08 Thread François Pinard
is we often need the built-in. Python should not choose common English words for its built-ins, without very careful thought, and be reluctant to any compulsion in this area. -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Migrating the Python CVS to Subversion

2005-08-02 Thread François Pinard
, Monotone does not seduce me. On the other hand, the two guys saying good about Monotone are well informed (and also well known), so I would not dismiss their opinion so lightly. So, it might be worth at least a quick look? :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Migrating the Python CVS to Subversion

2005-08-02 Thread François Pinard
, to be qualified as good. While it might be true on average, this is not necessarily true: some packages need not so many steps for becoming very usable, mature or stable. (Note that I'm not asserting anything about Monotone, here.) We should merely keep an open mind. -- François Pinard http

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP: Migrating the Python CVS to Subversion

2005-08-02 Thread François Pinard
[Donovan Baarda] It is true that some well designed/developed software becomes reliable very quicky. However, it still takes heavy use over time to prove that. There is wisdom in your say! :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

Re: [Python-Dev] Chaining try statements: eltry?

2005-07-07 Thread François Pinard
[Guido van Rossum] I even wonder if else-clauses on for/while were a good idea. I surely find them useful, and see them as a Python originality (a welcome one). -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python

Re: [Python-Dev] Chaining try statements: eltry?

2005-07-07 Thread François Pinard
[Guido van Rossum] On 7/7/05, François Pinard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Guido van Rossum] I even wonder if else-clauses on for/while were a good idea. I surely find them useful, and see them as a Python originality (a welcome one). The question remains whether Python would be easier

Re: [Python-Dev] Chaining try statements: eltry?

2005-07-07 Thread François Pinard
. `else:' falls in this category. It is nice and helpful to have, but is only one of the now numerous features of Python which are not essential. The fact that we can go without knowing something does not mean that this something is not welcome. Some priests do not know sex! :-) -- François Pinard

Re: [Python-Dev] Pre-PEP: Unifying try-except and try-finally

2005-05-06 Thread François Pinard
occurs frequently in my experience. Oh, I do not have solutions to offer, but it might be worth a thought from the mighty thinkers of this list :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http

Re: [Python-Dev] Adding any() and all()

2005-03-11 Thread François Pinard
their role, and then sum up to having nearly been an annoyance. Good if PEPs may be avoided! :-) -- François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev