On 2014-02-18 13:48, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
18.02.14 10:10, Paul Moore написав(ла):
Or alternatively, a default on None function - Oracle SQL calls this
nvl, so I will too:
def nvl(x, dflt):
return dflt if x is None else x
results = sorted(invoices, key=lambda x: nvl(x.duedate,
On 2014-02-14 08:04, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Sending this to python-dev as I'm wondering if this was considered when
the choice to have objects of different types raise a TypeError when
ordered...
So, the concrete I case I have is implementing stable ordering for the
python Range objects
On 2014-02-08 23:32, Guido van Rossum wrote:
We could really use more help reviewing and finishing asyncio's docs!
Some spelling mistakes:
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio.html
mimicks
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-task.html
returing
nummber
On 2014-01-27 00:26, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 01/26/2014 04:24 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Patches posted to the issue tracker on or after Wednesday Jan 29 at
12:00:01am will not be accepted.
Sorry, forgot to specify the time zone: PST, which is GMT -08:00.
Put another way, the submission
On 2014-01-16 05:32, Larry Hastings wrote:
[snip]
In the specific case of SHA1_new's string parameter, we could lie and
claim that the default value is b''. Internally we could still use NULL
as a default and get away with it. But this is only a happy
coincidence. Many (most?) functions like
On 2014-01-14 20:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 01/14/2014 10:52 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Which reminds me. Quite a few people have spoken out in favor of loud
failures rather than silent wrong output. But I think
On 2014-01-15 00:53, Rob Ward wrote:
I apologise if I have come to the wrong place here, but 12hrs searching,
plus experimenting, on the WWW for advice on it has not yielded any
successful advice to resolve the issue.
I am am having trouble binding an Entry widget to Return
Here is the
On 2014-01-13 21:51, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Terminology. Let's use the official terminology rather than making stuff up.
The docs at http://docs.python.org/3/library/string.html#formatspec
use the following terminology:
Replacement field: {...}; contains field name, conversion, format spec
in
On 2014-01-14 03:03, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/13/2014 7:48 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
And now for something completely different.
My root buildbot is finally now able to telnet out and get Connection
refused errors. (For the curious, the VirtualBox NAT mode doesn't
work properly, but the new NAT
On 2014-01-11 05:36, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[snip]
Latin-1 has the nice property that every byte decodes into the character
with the same code point, and visa versa. So:
for i in range(256):
assert bytes([i]).decode('latin-1') == chr(i)
assert chr(i).encode('latin-1') == bytes([i])
On 2014-01-09 00:07, Ben Finney wrote:
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com writes:
Believe it or not, sometimes you really don't care about encodings.
Sometimes you just want to parse text files.
Files don't contain text, they contain bytes. Bytes only become text
when filtered
On 2014-01-06 13:24, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
bytes % args and bytes.format(args) are requested by Mercurial and
Twisted projects. The issue #3982 was stuck because nobody proposed a
complete definition of the new features. Here is a try as a PEP.
The PEP is a draft with open questions.
On 05/12/2013 19:22, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 12/05/2013 10:56 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
How would you get the docstrings in? [...]
One way to reduce the amount of boilerplate code is to make abstractmethod
to supply raise
On 20/11/2013 23:36, Christian Tismer wrote:
Hey Barry,
On 20.11.13 23:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 09:52 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
Many customers are forced to stick with Python 2.X because of other products,
but they require a Python 2.X version which can be compiled using
Has anybody here heard about this, and, if so, is it anything we should
be thinking about:
How your compiler may be compromising application security
http://www.itworld.com/security/380406/how-your-compiler-may-be-compromising-application-security
___
On 24/10/2013 15:40, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24. október 2013 12:44
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Python Dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Updated PEP 454 (tracemalloc): no more metrics!
Not everything is a PC
On 12/10/2013 05:05, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 07:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
(RDM is also right that the exception still has the effect of
terminating the block early, but I view names as mnemonics rather
than necessarily 100% accurate descriptions
On 11/10/2013 18:39, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:43 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Maybe to fit in with other verb-like APIs used as context managers:
it's open() not opened().
open() predates context managers, but maybe we need a new
On 11/10/2013 19:41, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 10:19 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Maybe to fit in with other verb-like APIs used as context managers:
it's open() not opened().
open()
On 08/10/2013 19:02, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
Following the python-dev discussion, I've written a PEP to recap the
proposal and the various arguments. It's inlined below, and
On 08/10/2013 23:21, Tim Delaney wrote:
On 9 October 2013 09:10, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
It's not actually so much the extreme waste that I'm looking to
expose, but rather the day-to-day annoyances of stuff you use
regularly that slows you
On 28/09/2013 12:28, Kevin Ngugi wrote:
Hi, I just downloaded Python 3.3 top teach myself how to program, I am
new to programming, but the guide I am using requires me to access the
toolbar, which I cannot seem to find. How do I find it and have it
displayed on the interface? I tried v 3.1 but
| method ignored? It explains fairly clearly what has
| happened, and also indicates what do do about it --
| catch it in the __del__ method.
|
| Exception in __del__ caught and not propagated:
| Georg
On 24Sep2013 09:33, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
| [MRAB]:
| Why not just
On 24/09/2013 09:06, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 September 2013 17:34, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:25:10 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
You are setting the bar unreasonably high for an error message that
has to convey a complex concept in as
On 23/09/2013 20:01, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/22/2013 10:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Glad you like it. I still do, too, but I've given up hope to convince
all core developers to stick to this style. :-(
[me] ('Return' rather than 'Returns' is the current convention.)
That's actually a
On 23/09/2013 22:19, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 Sep 2013 01:24, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:51:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 September 2013 18:45, Antoine Pitrou
On 14/09/2013 05:47, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 09/13/2013 08:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You're missing that I'm not iterating over the entire dict, just some
subset (data) that I got from elsewhere.
Ah, okay. Between you and Antoine I am convinced that .getitem() is a good
thing. So have
On 14/09/2013 01:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:45:16PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Ok, I have a better (IMO) proposal:
d = TransformDict(str.casefold, {'Foo': 1})
d.getitem('foo')
('Foo', 1)
d.getitem('bar')
Traceback (most recent call last):
On 14/09/2013 02:40, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 09/13/2013 06:25 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 14/09/2013 01:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Is it more common to want both the canonical key and value at the same
time, or to just want the canonical key? My gut feeling is that I'm
likely to have code like
On 10/09/2013 20:08, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10 September 2013 19:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I think it would be a flaw to have this detail implementation-defined.
This would be like saying that it is implementation-defined which
of A,B,C is returned from A and B and C if all
On 10/09/2013 22:46, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:44:20 -0300
Joao S. O. Bueno jsbu...@python.org.br wrote:
On 10 September 2013 18:06, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:38:26 -0300
Joao S. O. Bueno jsbu...@python.org.br wrote:
On 10 September
On 06/09/2013 10:54, Andrew Miller wrote:
The unicodedata module only contains data up to Unicode 5.2 (October
2009), so attempting to reference any character from a later version e.g:
unicodedata.lookup(TURKISH LIRA SIGN)
results in a KeyError.
Also, it seems to be limited to properties in
On 28/08/2013 07:29, Paul Moore wrote:
On 27 August 2013 23:17, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
Thanks for your tiresome work
I'm guessing you meant tireless here :-)
That depends. It might have been tiresome for the one doing it!
On 15/08/2013 13:29, R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:22:14 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:16:20 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/15 Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net:
We don't have any substantial change in
On 14/08/2013 17:17, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 11:55, Brett Cannon br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Nick Coghlan
On 17/07/2013 05:15, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
On 7/15/2013 10:20 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Or is this something deeper, that a group *is* a new object in
principle?
No, I just think of it as returning a string
That is exactly what the doc says
On 16/07/2013 00:30, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
In a discussion about mypy I discovered that the Python 3 version of
the re module's Match object behaves subtly different from the Python
On 16/07/2013 01:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 16/07/2013 00:30, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
In a discussion about mypy
On 08/06/2013 23:30, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[Diverting to python-ideas, since this isn't as clear-cut as you think.]
Why exactly is that expected behavior? What's the use case? (Surely
you don't have a keyboard that generates \u2212 when you hit the minus
key? :-)
Is there a Unicode standard
I've just tried to upload to PyPI using setup.py and got this error:
Upload failed (503): backend write error
Can anyone tell me what it means?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
On 05/06/2013 03:07, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:47 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
I've just tried to upload to PyPI using setup.py and got this error:
Upload failed (503): backend write error
Can anyone tell me what it means
On 29/05/2013 00:29, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
On 5/28/2013 3:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:06:39 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Yes, Nick suggested README instead of what I had. I want a prefix to
keep it near the top of a directory listing even when other non
On 10/05/2013 11:55, Ben Hoyt wrote:
A few of us were having a discussion at
http://bugs.python.org/issue11406 about adding os.scandir(): a
generator version of os.listdir() to make iterating over very large
directories more memory efficient. This also reflects how the OS gives
things to you --
On 05/05/2013 23:01, Matej Cepl wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org
To: Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2013 11:59:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Difference in RE between 3.2 and 3.3 (or Aaron Swartz
memorial)
Hi
On 29/04/2013 19:24, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 30/04/13 03:01, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Oh dear, this is actually a mess. I don't want MoreColor.red and
Color.red to be distinct objects, but then the isinstance() checks
will become confusing. If we don't override isinstance(), we'll
get
not
On 29/04/2013 21:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 30/04/13 05:02, MRAB wrote:
Why is that backwards? MoreColor is a subclass of Color, so
instances of MoreColor are instances of Color, but instances of
Color are not instances of MoreColor. That's normal behaviour for
subclasses. (All cats
On 26/04/2013 06:21, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 04/25/2013 08:14 PM, Greg wrote:
On 26/04/2013 1:28 p.m., Ethan Furman wrote:
Interesting idea, but why does Day(3) have to be disallowed to make it
work?
Because it's ambiguous. Which day of the week is number 3? It
depends on where you start.
On 25/04/2013 14:34, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I can think of many usecases where I want to *embed* base64-encoded
data in a larger text *before* encoding that text and transmitting
it over a 8-bit channel.
That still
On 25/04/2013 15:22, MRAB wrote:
On 25/04/2013 14:34, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I can think of many usecases where I want to *embed* base64-encoded
data in a larger text *before* encoding that text and transmitting
it over
On 26/04/2013 00:09, Ethan Furman wrote:
We just fixed NoneType() to return None instead of raising an exception.
Another use-case for calling NoneType is working with ORMs:
result = []
for field in row:
type = get_type(field) # returns int, bool, str, NoneType, ...
On 26/04/2013 00:59, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 4/25/2013 3:23 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
My point is, days of the week has a natural ordering, so why wouldn't you
use IntEnum for that? Problem solved.
While the ordering is natural, some implementations start from 0, some
start from 1, and on
On 26/04/2013 01:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 26/04/13 09:56, MRAB wrote:
On the one hand, NoneType(None) seems a strange thing to do.
Only when you write it out like that as constants. It's no more,
or less, strange than str('spam') or int(1) or list([]). Why
would you do that?
None
On 2013-03-06 14:18, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Hi,
2013/3/6 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com mailto:mc...@redhat.com
On 2013-02-26, 16:25 GMT, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 2/21/2013 4:22 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
as my method to commemorate Aaron Swartz, I have decided to port his
On 2013-02-25 16:37, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Feb 25, 2013, at 07:12 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
And if, in those places, the enums were based on ints (or strings), would it
hurt you? Because in the places where I, as well as many others, use enums
we *need* the int portion; and having to wrap the
Since the PyPI security notice of 2013-02-15 I've been unable to upload
to PyPI via setup.py upload.
I changed my password during the grace period, and have reset it, but
it's still rejected:
Upload failed (401): Incorrect password
I can login to PyPI with the password.
Can anyone suggest
On 2013-02-22 02:09, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Since the PyPI security notice of 2013-02-15 I've been unable to upload
to PyPI via setup.py upload.
I changed my password during the grace period, and have reset it, but
it's still
On 2013-02-22 02:37, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2013-02-22 02:09, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Since the PyPI security notice of 2013-02-15 I've been unable
On 2013-02-13 13:23, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer x = '%s%s%s%s' % (a, b, c, d) when string's number is more than 3
and some of them are literal strings.
This has the benefit of being slow both on CPython and
On 2013-02-12 21:44, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:40:38 -0500
Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
But the only reason .join() is a Python idiom in the first place is
because it was the fast way to do what everyone initially coded as s
+= Just because we all
On 2012-12-12 23:33, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
As a Windows user, I would like there to be one tz data file used by all
Python versions on my machine, including ones included with other apps.
That would be nice, but where
On 2012-12-09 22:22, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi all,
The current CPython bytecode interpreter is rather more complex than it
needs to be. A number of bytecodes could be eliminated and a few more
simplified by moving the work involved in handling compound statements
(loops, try-blocks, etc) from the
On 2012-12-10 01:44, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
The current memory layout for dictionaries is
unnecessarily inefficient. It has a sparse table of
24-byte entries containing the hash value, key pointer,
and value pointer.
Instead, the 24-byte entries should be stored in a
dense table referenced
On 2012-12-08 20:18, PJ Eby wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 4:46 PM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
So if package A includes a Conflicts: B declaration, I recommend the
following:
* An attempt to install A with B
On 2012-12-09 01:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 09/12/12 08:14, MRAB wrote:
If package A says that it conflicts with package B, it may or may not
be symmetrical, because it's possible that package B has been updated
since the author of package A discovered the conflict, so it's
important
On 2012-12-06 02:12, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I understand the PEP author's frustration with continued discussion,
but I think this subthread on Obsoletes vs. Obsoleted-By is not mere
bikeshedding on names. It matters *which package* presents the
information.
Donald Stufft writes:
On
On 2012-11-14 20:53, Mark Adam wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Xavier Morel catch-...@masklinn.net wrote:
On 2012-11-14, at 19:54 , Mark Adam wrote:
Merging of two dicts is done with dict.update.
No, dict.update merges one dict (or two) into a third one.
No. I think you need to
On 2012-11-14 21:20, MRAB wrote:
On 2012-11-14 20:53, Mark Adam wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Xavier Morel catch-...@masklinn.net wrote:
On 2012-11-14, at 19:54 , Mark Adam wrote:
Merging of two dicts is done with dict.update.
No, dict.update merges one dict (or two) into a third
On 2012-11-14 21:40, Greg Ewing wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Perhaps an alternative question: What can be done to make the latter
less unpalatable?
* We could introduce a new syntax such as {a = 1, b = 2}.
* If the compiler were allowed to recognise builtins, it could
turn dict(a = 1, b = 2)
On 2012-11-06 15:02, Rob Cliffe wrote:
On 06/11/2012 12:01, Nick Coghlan wrote:
As noted, it's really only counterintuitive if your intuition is
primed to expect C style right to left chained assignments.
Python, on the other hand, is able to preserve primarily left to right
evaluation in
On 2012-10-19 02:03, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if there a reason for not using the hash of
(bytes or unicode) strings when comparing two objects and the hash of
the two objects was already been computed. Using the hash would speed
up comparaison of long strings when the two
On 2012-10-16 12:59, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Antoine Pitrou writes:
But, yes, I would call it higher level rather than easy to use
(I don't think there's a need for hyphens, by the way).
You don't need them to get the point across, but elderly grammar
pedants will think better of you
On 2012-10-03 16:28, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:55 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Regardless of when the first alpha happens, I'll be promoting the hell
out of it, begging for feedback on any of these changes that are
On 2012-09-30 19:55, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 30.09.12 16:15, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Probably, but for most purposes I would guess a 2-year old database is
still good enough? After all, you don't see many people complaining
about the outdated Unicode database that is hard-wired in past
On 2012-09-30 01:43, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in
we read: [...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparisons. For
example, Decimal(2) == 2 and 2 ==
On 11/09/2012 13:06, Victor Stinner wrote:
* Call builtin functions if arguments are constants. Examples:
- len(abc) = 3
- ord(A) = 65
Does it preserve python semantics? What if you change the len builtin?
This optimization is disabled by default (in the version 0.3), because
builtin
On 11/09/2012 22:46, Victor Stinner wrote:
2012/9/11 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
This is fine in an external project, but should never be added to the
standard library. The barrier to semantic changes that break
monkeypatching should be high.
The version 0.3 has a known bug: len=chr;
On 31/08/2012 02:43, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
We have use for _PyBytes_Join in an extension module but technically it
isn't a public Python C API... anyone know why?
PyUnicode_Join is.
Looking up the bytes 'join' method and using the C API to call that
method object with proper parameters seems
On 18/08/2012 18:34, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 21:27, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to change urlencode() to generate
URLs that don't depend on the hash order, for all versions
On 13/08/2012 02:39, Python Urlopen wrote:
[snip]
After a lot of pain, I got myself out of this trouble, and my code
now works correctly on 2.7.x (thanks to Jean-Paul Calderone's
pyopenssl). But do you think this is a feature and not a bug?
-- And do you think debating on this, killing time
On 05/08/2012 23:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I keep an eye open for this but can't find one for Saturday 03/08/2012.
Have I missed it, has it been stopped, has something gone wrong with
its production or what?
I haven't seen it either.
___
On 03/08/2012 19:53, Dheeraj Goswami wrote:
Hi Python Gurus,
I am an experienced Java developer and have been working on it for about
8 years. I need to build a web 2.0/AJAX based website/application and I
am thinking to build it in Django which means I need to learn and move
to Python.
Please
On 03/08/2012 21:46, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
I would like people's opinions on issue 15510, specifically whether it
should be addressed and in what versions:
http://bugs.python.org/issue15510
Jesús suggested that I ask. The issue relates to textwrap.wrap()'s
behavior when wrapping strings that
On 27/07/2012 20:12, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/7/26 Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org:
Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one?
Probably late fall or early 2013.
Or, for those in the southern hemisphere, late spring or early 2013.
On 22/06/2012 17:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/22/2012 6:57 AM, larry.hastings wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ace45d23628a
changeset: 77567:ace45d23628a
user:Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org
date:Fri Jun 22 03:56:29 2012 -0700
summary:
Issue #14769: test_capi now
On 22/06/2012 21:45, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 06/22/2012 01:29 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Of course. And character 32 space is also not usable and perhaps not
worth testing.
Au contraire! I grant you, it's hard to imagine how using it would be a
good idea. But strictly speaking it is *usable*.
On 18/06/2012 00:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the internals of
the string literal
It looks like PyPI is down. :-(
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 14/06/2012 15:15, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 13.06.2012 23:59, schrieb sandro.tosi:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/744fb52ffdf0
changeset: 77417:744fb52ffdf0
branch: 2.7
parent: 77408:60a7b704de5c
user:Sandro Tosisandro.t...@gmail.com
date:Wed Jun 13 23:58:35
On 05/06/2012 03:40, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/4/2012 9:22 PM, MRAB wrote:
I'm not planning any further changes to regex. I think it already has
enough features...
Do you have any idea where regex + Python stands in regard to Unicode
TR18 support levels? http://unicode.org/reports/tr18
On 06/06/2012 02:57, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg Ewinggreg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
What would be so bad about giving datetime objects
a DST flag? Apps that don't care could ignore it and
get results no worse than the status quo.
This would neatly
(I've been having trouble with my email recently, so I missed this
thread amongst others.)
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing
On 05/06/2012 01:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
help out.
Are you
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\n, axb))
'a\\nb'
However:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\x0A, axb))
'ax0Ab'
Yes, it doesn't recognise \xNN.
Is there a reason for
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\n,
On 11/12/2011 21:04, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I
On 27/08/2011 00:08, Tom Christiansen wrote:
M.-A. Lemburgm...@egenix.com wrote
on Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:00:31 +0200:
The good part is that it's based on the re code, the FUD comes
from the fact that the new lib is 380kB larger than the old one
and that's not even counting the generated
Someone over at StackOverflow has a problem with urlopen in Python 3.2.1:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6892573/problem-with-urlopen/6892843#6892843
This is the code:
from urllib.request import urlopen
f =
Some of those who are relative new to regexes sometimes ask how to write
a regex which checks that a number is in a range or is a valid date.
Although this may be possible, it certainly isn't easy.
From what I've read, Perl has a way of including code in a regex, but I
don't think that's a
On 03/03/2011 15:09, Graham Stratton wrote:
On Mar 2, 3:01 pm, Graham Strattongrahamstrat...@gmail.com wrote:
We are using marshal for serialising objects before distributing them
around the cluster, and extremely occasionally a corrupted marshal is
produced. The current workaround is to
On 18/12/2010 09:26, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Comments?
How do you implement that? In particular, how do you retrieve
information for different locales in a single program?
The locale module would be able to return a named locale dict:
loc = locale.getnamedlocale('en_UK')
or:
loc =
301 - 400 of 506 matches
Mail list logo
