Dennis Allison writes:
I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
clearly.
Ben Chelf writes:
Of course it's no surprise that I see open
source projects everywhere -- as part of infrastructure or part of code
bases that people are developing. So from a Coverity
Michael Chermside wrote:
(PS: too bad I can't buy stock in Coverity. How come all the GOOD
companies are private? I had to wait around 6 years before I could
buy stock in Google.)
Maybe because the companies whose stock is available early are companies
bent on producing stock profits, rather
The Coverty marketing droids need to be a bit less anal about getting
people to register at the website. IMHO, the technology should be
Honestly, I laughed out loud when I read this. ;) So thanks for that.
I'd also encourage Coventry to explain their business model a bit more
clearly.
On 3/7/06, Ben Chelf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting on my idealistic hat and remembering back my grad school days, Ithink we're on to something very new in the world of source codeanalysis. I really just want every developer to use source code analysiswhile they write code (remember, idealistic
Hello Python Developers,
I'm the CTO of Coverity, Inc., a company that does static source code
analysis to look for defects in code. You may have heard of us or of our
technology from its days at Stanford (the Stanford Checker). The
reason I'm writing is because we have set up a framework
[Ben Chelf [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
group nominated individuals) reach out to me to request access.
Didn't we set up a security swat team some time
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
[Ben Chelf [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a bit
further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
group nominated individuals) reach out to me to request
On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't we set up a security swat team some time ago?If not, we should.Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like to be on it.Yep, it's called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailinglist, which I'd be happy for you
[Barry]
Yep, it's called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with a semi-secret backing mailing
list, which I'd be happy for you to join!).
If guessing the right Mailman URL was the semi-secret test, I passed :-)
I definitely think that group of folks at the least should review the results.
Yup!
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 14:26 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
[Ben Chelf [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
...
I'd ask that if you are interested in really digging into the results a
bit
further for your project, please have a couple of core maintainers (or
FWIW, coverity has been busy marketing this already:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/84465/key-opensource-code-passes-muster.html
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On 3/6/06, Thomas Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't we set up a security swat team some time ago? If not, we
should. Regardless, since I have more free time these days, I'd like
to be on it.
Yep, it's called [EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
