Fredrik, if you would like to help move this all forward, great; I
would appreciate the help. You can write a page scraper to get the
data out of SF
challenge accepted ;-)
http://effbot.python-hosting.com/browser/stuff/sandbox/sourceforge/
contains three basic tools; getindex to grab
On 4/2/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fredrik, if you would like to help move this all forward, great; I
would appreciate the help. You can write a page scraper to get the
data out of SF
challenge accepted ;-)
Woohoo!
On 3/30/06, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
Same here. Please move any more comments about infrastructure to the
infrastructure list
(http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure/). But
do realize the committee is not discussing trackers yet. We
Robert Kern wrote:
FWIW: Trac has a Sourceforge bug tracker import script:
http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/browser/trunk/contrib/sourceforge2trac.py
Apologies: for the other blank reply.
That isn't actually worth that much: somebody would need to operate it,
too. Mere existence doesn't
Brett Cannon wrote:
Same here. Please move any more comments about infrastructure to the
infrastructure list
(http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure/). But
do realize the committee is not discussing trackers yet. We are still
trying to get our SF data out so that can be
Brett Cannon wrote:
On 3/28/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
which
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I can ask them for a test py3k account, if there's any interest.
I'm personally not very much interested in a Py3k tracker; I don't
see myself using it. So I'm not interested in a trac-based one,
either.
Me neither. It's too early.
I wasn't really expecting
Brett Cannon wrote:
On 3/28/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My view is that nothing should be considered unless there is
a) a volunteer to operate the tracker (or, failing that, somebody who
does it for money), and
b) an importer of whatever data SF can provide.
And as the
Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:35, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects
(like GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
Please
Wolfgang Langner wrote:
what about trac:
http://www.edgewall.com/trac/
It is based on python and has a very good svn integration.
We started using it recently and so far it's working really well. I love
the svn (and wiki!) integration. However, I have no idea how well it
scales to a
On 3/28/06, Wolfgang Langner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about trac:http://www.edgewall.com/trac/It is based on python and has a very good svn integration.Sorry, I should have realized more than half of python-dev lacked the context in which I made my suggestion. At PyCon and in a few other
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:13 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable, maintained
and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
The infrastructure committee (of which I'm a member but not the chair)
is
Barry The infrastructure committee (of which I'm a member but not the
Barry chair) is examining the alternatives and trying to put up some
Barry live demos for people to check out.
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)? Trac is being used by the
folks doing the new website.
Op di, 28-03-2006 te 09:23 -0600, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Based on my brief experience as a Bugzilla user (just trying to be a good
citizen and report Mozilla bugs a few years ago), I would vote -1. I'd hate
to think the bug reporting interface was *so* bad that it alone would
discourage
Anthony Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:13, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
Please god no. No bugzilla,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
which has complete data but is ill-formed XML, has no importer into
roundup at
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
which has complete data but is ill-formed XML, has no
On 3/28/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
which has complete data
18 matches
Mail list logo
