On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2010/7/23 Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com:
Thanks, everyone who followed up here and on the tracker. I am
readying the patch for check in, but as I look back through the
messages, I don't really
Thanks, everyone who followed up here and on the tracker. I am
readying the patch for check in, but as I look back through the
messages, I don't really see anyone's answer to the question in the
subject:
* Include datetime.py in stdlib or not?
I hope this means an implied yes, include. Since
2010/7/23 Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com:
Thanks, everyone who followed up here and on the tracker. I am
readying the patch for check in, but as I look back through the
messages, I don't really see anyone's answer to the question in the
subject:
* Include datetime.py
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
.. and import _strptime had to be moved from function level to
module level after class definitions due to circular dependency of
_strptime on datetime.
This turned out to be not such a great idea.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
..
I can say that all the VM representatives have all said they like the idea.
This is encouraging. Here is an update on the status of datetime.py.
I believe it is mostly ready to move from sandbox to py3k/Lib. The
patch is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:17, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/7/2010 3:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
That's the idea. We already have contributors from the various VMs who
has commit privileges, but they all work in their own repos for
convenience. My hope is that if we break the stdlib
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/6/2010 3:59 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
[.. skipping more general stdlib discussion see Python equivalents in
stdlib thread ..]
2. There are other areas of stdlib that can benefit more from pure
python equivalents.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 20:54, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/6/2010 3:59 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
I am more interested in Brett's overall vision than this particular module.
I understand that to be one of a stdlib that is separate from CPython and is
indeed the standard
On 7/7/2010 3:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
That's the idea. We already have contributors from the various VMs who
has commit privileges, but they all work in their own repos for
convenience. My hope is that if we break the stdlib out into its own
repository that people simply pull in then other
This idea has been discussed extensively in this and other forums and
I believe it is time to make a decision.
The proposal is to add pure python implementation of datetime module
to stdlib. The current C implementation will transparently override
pure python definitions in CPython. Other
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:59, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
This idea has been discussed extensively in this and other forums and
I believe it is time to make a decision.
The proposal is to add pure python implementation of datetime module
to stdlib. The current
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think? Please reply here or add a comment at
http://bugs.python.org/issue7989.
(For those that haven't read the tracker discussion, it's long, but
worth skimming to get a better idea of the
On 7/6/2010 3:59 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
I am more interested in Brett's overall vision than this particular
module. I understand that to be one of a stdlib that is separate from
CPython and is indeed the standard Python library.
Questions:
!. Would the other distributions use a
13 matches
Mail list logo
