Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-28 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Phillip J. Eby wrote: At 09:54 PM 4/27/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Note that I was talking about the .pth file being writable, not the directory. Please stop this vague, handwaving FUD. You have yet to explain how this situation is supposed to arise. Is there some platform on which

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-28 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: No, I'm talking about a format which has the same if not more benefits as what you're trying to achieve with the .egg file approach, but without all the magic and hacks. It's not like this wouldn't be possible to achieve. That may or may not be true. Perhaps if you had

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-28 Thread Phillip J. Eby
(Thank you, by the way, for actually reading some of the documentation before writing this post, and for asking questions instead of jumping to conclusions.) At 06:43 PM 4/28/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: I've now found this section in the documentation which seems to have the reason:

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-27 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 06:47 PM 4/27/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Just read that you are hijacking site.py for setuptools' just works purposes. hijacking isn't the word I'd use; wrapping is what it actually does. The standard site.py is executed, there is just some pre- and post-processing of sys.path.

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-27 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Phillip J. Eby wrote: At 06:47 PM 4/27/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Just read that you are hijacking site.py for setuptools' just works purposes. hijacking isn't the word I'd use; wrapping is what it actually does. The standard site.py is executed, there is just some pre- and

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-27 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 09:54 PM 4/27/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Note that I was talking about the .pth file being writable, not the directory. Please stop this vague, handwaving FUD. You have yet to explain how this situation is supposed to arise. Is there some platform on which files with a .pth extension

[Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-25 Thread Phillip J. Eby
Please see http://svn.python.org/projects/sandbox/trunk/setuptools/doc/formats.txt for source, or http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EggFormats for an HTML-formatted version. Included are summary descriptions of the formats of all of the standard metadata produced by setuptools, along

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-25 Thread Brent Fulgham
Included are summary descriptions of the formats of all of the standard metadata produced by setuptools, along with pointers to the existing manuals that describe the syntax used for representing requirements, entry points, etc. as text. The .egg, .egg-info, and .egg-link formats and layouts

Re: [Python-Dev] Internal documentation for egg formats now available

2006-04-25 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 04:41 PM 4/25/2006 -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote: Included are summary descriptions of the formats of all of the standard metadata produced by setuptools, along with pointers to the existing manuals that describe the syntax used for representing requirements, entry points, etc. as text. The .egg,