"Heiko Wundram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > As I've noticed that I find myself typing the latter quite often > in code I write, it would only be sensible to add the corresponding > syntax for the for statement: > > for node in tree if node.haschildren(): > <do something with node> > > as syntactic sugar for: > > for node in tree: > if not node.haschildren(): > continue > <do something with node>
Isn't this the same as for node in tree: if node.haschildren(): <do something with node> so that all you would save is ':\n' and the extra indents? tjr _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com