Once the cron job works it magic, the updated PEP 343 should be available on
the website.
As far as I am aware, there aren't any more open issues, so it is once again
ready for BDFL pronouncement.
I also tinkered with the example naming a bit, and added a new example for the
nested context
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 10/16/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope you reverted the status to Proposed...
I hadn't, but I've now fixed that in CVS (both in the PEP and the PEP index),
and added some text into the PEP saying why it was reverted to Draft.
On the latter: I think
Andrew Koenig wrote:
PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
Highlights of the changes:
- changed the name of the PEP to be simply The 'with' Statement
Do you mean PEP 346, perchance? PEP 343 is something else entirely.
No, I mean PEP 343 - it describes Guido's proposal for a with
PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
Highlights of the changes:
- changed the name of the PEP to be simply The 'with' Statement
- added __with__() method
- added section on standard terminology (that is, contexts/context managers)
- changed generator context decorator name to
On 10/16/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
Highlights of the changes:
- changed the name of the PEP to be simply The 'with' Statement
- added __with__() method
- added section on standard terminology (that is, contexts/context
PEP 343 has been updated on python.org.
Highlights of the changes:
- changed the name of the PEP to be simply The 'with' Statement
Do you mean PEP 346, perchance? PEP 343 is something else entirely.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
