x86_64 is multiarch. That means, we allow both
i386 and x86_64 binaries to coexits. Is the proposal
that python should not support this? That would
be unfortunate.
The problem is that at the moment, a package
has to live all in one place. This doesn't mean
you can't have both types of
Neal Becker wrote:
x86_64 is multiarch. That means, we allow both i386 and x86_64 binaries to
coexits. Is the proposal that python should not support this? That would
be unfortunate.
No. You should install the Python library to the architecture-specific
directory (/usr/lib64/python2.3 for
Neal Becker wrote:
1. Does it make sense to have both
site-dep/app/subpackage
and
site-indep/app/subpackage
?
My answer: definitely yes. We already agree that we should have both
site-dep for binary code and site-indep for python code, so there is no way
to avoid this.
I'm not sure
On 3/17/06, Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, let's talk about it.1. Does it make sense to have bothsite-dep/app/subpackage andsite-indep/app/subpackage?My answer: definitely yes. Nope. It would make sense to have .py files in site-indep and .pyc, .pyo and .so files in site-dep, but Python
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
1. Does it make sense to have both
site-dep/app/subpackage
and
site-indep/app/subpackage
?
My answer: definitely yes. We already agree that we should have both
site-dep for binary code and site-indep for python code, so there is no
way to
On 3/18/06, Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x86_64 is multiarch.That means, we allow both i386 and x86_64 binaries tocoexits.Is the proposal that python should not support this?That wouldbe unfortunate.Not within a single interpreter, I'd say. Extensions compiled for x86_64 will not load into
On Mar 17, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
Sorry, maybe I used confusing terminology.
A reference is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python
This is the current setup. For example, this is a standard macro
used by
Redhat in
I just installed TwistedSumo-2006-02-12 on x86_64, and noticed a problem.
It installs arch-dep stuff into
/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted,
and arch-indep into
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted
as it should. But:
from twisted.web import html
exceptions.ImportError: No
Neal Becker wrote:
I'm guessing that what's happening is that since there is an
arch-dep/twisted, we never find the module arch-indep/twisted/web. If
my analysis (guess) is correct, I think we have a problem with the module
search.
That is quite possible. I keep applying patches from people
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I'm guessing that what's happening is that since there is an
arch-dep/twisted, we never find the module arch-indep/twisted/web.
If my analysis (guess) is correct, I think we have a problem with the
module search.
That is quite possible. I keep
10 matches
Mail list logo
