On 10/01/2022 17.01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 01. 22 19:39, Christian Heimes wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remind everybody that Python's support for OpenSSL 3.0
is preliminary [1]. Python compiles with OpenSSL 3.0.0 and simple code
kinda works. However there are known performance
On 11/01/2022 12.02, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:39:06 +0100
Christian Heimes wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remind everybody that Python's support for OpenSSL 3.0
is preliminary [1]. Python compiles with OpenSSL 3.0.0 and simple code
kinda works. However there are
Hi Christian,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 19:39:06 +0100
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to remind everybody that Python's support for OpenSSL 3.0
> is preliminary [1]. Python compiles with OpenSSL 3.0.0 and simple code
> kinda works. However there are known performance regressions,
On 09. 01. 22 19:39, Christian Heimes wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remind everybody that Python's support for OpenSSL 3.0 is
preliminary [1]. Python compiles with OpenSSL 3.0.0 and simple code kinda
works. However there are known performance regressions, missing features (e.g.
usedforsecurity
Is there an issue that keeps track of all the missing pieces? A "remaining
tasks" list would be useful for involving more devs (and of course useful when
resuming development, "now, where was I..."). A quick search on BPO revealed
some info:
- bpo-46313: SSLObject does not raise SSLEOFError on
