[Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings

2022-02-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 4:59 PM S Pradeep Kumar wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:55 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > >> Can I suggest adding a "Specification" section (see >> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0012/#suggested-sections for the >> suggested sections to have in a PEP)? >> > > Brett: I'm

[Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings

2022-02-07 Thread S Pradeep Kumar
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:55 PM Brett Cannon wrote: > Can I suggest adding a "Specification" section (see > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0012/#suggested-sections for the > suggested sections to have in a PEP)? > Brett: I'm sorry about this oversight. I've fixed it in

[Python-Dev] Re: RFC on PEP 675: Arbitrary Literal Strings

2022-02-07 Thread Brett Cannon
Can I suggest adding a "Specification" section (see https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0012/#suggested-sections for the suggested sections to have in a PEP)? When you first pull up the PEP it goes from "Rationale" to "Valid Locations for LiteralString". As a reader that doesn't point me at a