On 2021-04-29 18:56, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 4/29/21 10:52 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:37:29 +0100, MRAB wrote:
>> On 2021-04-29 18:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> An excerpt from bpo-31369: re.RegexFlag and `__all__`
>>>
>>> GvR:
>>>
>>>> One thing I
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:28 AM Jonathan Goble wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:00 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>> On 4/29/21 10:35 AM, Jonathan Goble wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Which raises the question: Do we want to have a standard name for
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:00 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 4/29/21 10:35 AM, Jonathan Goble wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>
> >> Which raises the question: Do we want to have a standard name for
> stdlib Flags when no flags are set?
> >
> > If you want a
On 4/29/21 10:35 AM, Jonathan Goble wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Which raises the question: Do we want to have a standard name for stdlib
Flags when no flags are set?
>
> If you want a flag to represent no flags set, it takes one line to write it
yourself,
On 4/29/21 10:52 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:37:29 +0100, MRAB wrote:
>> On 2021-04-29 18:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> An excerpt from bpo-31369: re.RegexFlag and `__all__`
>>>
>>> GvR:
>>>
>>>> One thing I discovered when developing this example: there doesn't
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:37:29 +0100
MRAB wrote:
> On 2021-04-29 18:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
> > An excerpt from bpo-31369: re.RegexFlag and `__all__`
> >
> > GvR:
> >
> > > One thing I discovered when developing this example: there doesn't seem
> > to be a flag to
> > > represent 0
On 2021-04-29 18:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
An excerpt from bpo-31369: re.RegexFlag and `__all__`
GvR:
> One thing I discovered when developing this example: there doesn't seem to
be a flag to
> represent 0 (zero), i.e. "no flags". And foo(0) is a type error (even
though it works
>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> An excerpt from bpo-31369: re.RegexFlag and `__all__`
>
> GvR:
>
> > One thing I discovered when developing this example: there doesn't seem
> to be a flag to
> > represent 0 (zero), i.e. "no flags". And foo(0) is a type error (even
>
