Guido van Rossum wrote:
I also notice that _compile() is needlessly written as a varargs
function -- all its uses pass it exactly two arguments.
that's because the function uses [1] the argument tuple as the cache key,
and I wanted to make the cache hit path as fast as possible.
(but that was
Guido wrote:
They *are* cached and there is no cost to using the functions instead
of the methods unless you have so many regexps in your program that
the cache is cleared (the limit is 100).
Sure there is; the cost of looking them up in the cache.
...
So in this (highly
Am I the only who are getting mails from iextream at naver.com
whenever I post to python-dev, btw?
My Korean (?) isn't that good, so I'm not sure what they want...
/F
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
[Fredrik Lundh]
Am I the only who are getting mails from iextream at naver.com
whenever I post to python-dev, btw?
My Korean (?) isn't that good, so I'm not sure what they want...
Only thing I've seen from them is one post in the archives, on June 13:
On 9/2/05, Gareth McCaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 2005-09-01 18:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
They *are* cached and there is no cost to using the functions instead
of the methods unless you have so many regexps in your program that
the cache is cleared (the limit is 100).
On Thursday 2005-09-01 18:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
They *are* cached and there is no cost to using the functions instead
of the methods unless you have so many regexps in your program that
the cache is cleared (the limit is 100).
Sure there is; the cost of looking them up in the cache.
On 8/31/05, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael == Michael Chermside [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael (2) is what we have today, but I would prefer (1) to
Michael gently encourage people to use the precompiled objects
Michael (which are distinctly faster when
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
But you could have string objects (or a derivative) grow a
compiled_regexp attribute internally.
That would make the core dependent on the re module,
which I think would be a bad idea.
Personally I like the way the compilation step is
made at least somewhat explicit.
Greg == Greg Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greg Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
But you could have string objects (or a derivative) grow a
compiled_regexp attribute internally.
Greg That would make the core dependent on the re module, which I
Greg think would be a bad idea.
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 17:35, Michael Chermside wrote:
An excellent point. Obviously, EITHER (1) the module functions ought to
be documented by reference to the RE object methods, or vice versa:
(2) document the RE object methods by reference to the module functions.
Agreed. I think the
Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather see it reversed from what it is as well. While I don't have
the
time myself (and don't consider it a critical issue), I certainly won't
revert a patch to make the change without good reason. :-)
Do
11 matches
Mail list logo
