Nick Coghlan wrote:
Brett C. wrote:
OK, thanks to John Ehresman here at PyCon sprint I got logistix's
patch applied. Beyond a warning that a warning that decode_unicode()
is never called and the parser module failing to compile under Windows
everything should be fine for compiling the AST
I've uploaded a new package to the new PyPI. Editing this
new packages gives me a unicode error. The URL is
http://www.python.org/pypi?:action=submit_formname=ll-ansistyleversion=0.6.1
The error I get is the following:
---
Error...
There's been a problem with your request
Zitat von Walter Dörwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've uploaded a new package to the new PyPI. Editing this
new packages gives me a unicode error. The URL is
http://www.python.org/pypi?:action=submit_formname=ll-ansistyleversion=0.6.1
I see that the package is online now, so I assume that
it now
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:32:46 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't set the Python version for sdist uploads.
Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
Source code that uses @decoration won't work in
Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.1.
When I'll finish, this will be put in an informational PEP.
When I verified the bug, I filled two fields:
- Summary: the same subject as in SF
- Group: the bug's group at verifying time.
- Bug #: the bug number
- Verified: is
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 16:09, Jim Jewett wrote:
Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
Source code that uses @decoration won't work in python 1.5
This is distinct from the version of Python
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:00:50 -0500, Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 16:09, Jim Jewett wrote:
Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
Source code that uses
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 18:29, Jim Jewett wrote:
This is distinct from the version of Python used to build a
distribution.
In theory, yes.
My suspicion is that if people are using the defaults, then they are
probably also using a python version that they have tested with -- and
