But... only as an additional option, not as a replacement, right?
Michael
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:01:14 -0500, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is something I've typed way too many times:
Py class C():
File stdin, line 1
class C():
^
Tim Peters wrote:
[Fredrik Lundh]
wouldn't be the first time...
How soon we forget wink.
oh, that was in the dark ages of Python 1.4. I've rebooted myself many times
since
then...
Fredrik introduced a pile of optimizations special-casing the snot out
of small integers into ceval.c a
Donovan Baarda wrote:
Apparently lawyers have decided that you can't give code away. Intellectual
charity is illegal :-)
what else would a lawyer say? do you really expect lawyers to admit that there
are ways to do things that don't involve lawyers?
/F
Donovan Baarda wrote:
Seriously, on the Python lists there has been a discussion rejecting an
md5sum implementation because the author donated it to the public domain.
Apparently lawyers have decided that you can't give code away. Intellectual
charity is illegal :-)
Despite the smiley: It is not
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
I'd say that this explains why it would still make sense to let the code
generator change
x in (a, b, c) to x == a or x == b or x == c, as long as a, b, and c
are all integers.
How often does that happen in real code?
Dunno
This is something I've typed way too many times:
Py class C():
File stdin, line 1
class C():
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
It's the asymmetry with functions that gets to me - defining a
function with no arguments still requires parentheses in the
