[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 448 review

2023-03-29 Thread Ethan Furman
On 3/29/23 13:23, Brett Cannon wrote: Wow, we are now getting Canadian-specific spam! Since the volume on this mailing list is so low, should we change everyone to be moderated to start and then remove that after they have posted appropriately? Or did this get through by accident? Accident.

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 448 review

2023-03-29 Thread Ethan Furman
My apologies for the accidentally accepted spam. If you reply to that original message, please remove the link before sending. Thanks. ;-) -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 448 review

2023-03-29 Thread Oleg Broytman
ChatGPT spam, specifically generated for Python mailing list filters. :mad: On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 01:23:03PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: > Wow, we are now getting Canadian-specific spam! > > Since the volume on this mailing list is so low, should we change everyone > to be moderated to start

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 448 review

2023-03-29 Thread Brett Cannon
Wow, we are now getting Canadian-specific spam! Since the volume on this mailing list is so low, should we change everyone to be moderated to start and then remove that after they have posted appropriately? Or did this get through by accident? On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:19 PM wrote: > It seems

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 448 review

2023-03-29 Thread extraappliance2022
It seems like you have thoroughly read through the PEP and the discussion thread and have formed an opinion about the proposed changes. It's great that you have taken the time to understand the proposal and the reasoning behind it. Georg Brandl's comments and Greg Ewing's explanations do shed